Advertisement
Research Article

Drug Susceptibility in Leishmania Isolates Following Miltefosine Treatment in Cases of Visceral Leishmaniasis and Post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis

  • Vasundhra Bhandari equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Vasundhra Bhandari, Arpita Kulshrestha

    Affiliation: National Institute of Pathology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, India

    X
  • Arpita Kulshrestha equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Vasundhra Bhandari, Arpita Kulshrestha

    Affiliation: National Institute of Pathology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, India

    X
  • Deepak Kumar Deep,

    Affiliation: National Institute of Pathology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, India

    X
  • Olivia Stark,

    Affiliation: Institute of Microbiology and Hygiene, Charite University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    X
  • Vijay Kumar Prajapati,

    Affiliation: Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

    X
  • V. Ramesh,

    Affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

    X
  • Shyam Sundar,

    Affiliation: Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

    X
  • Gabriele Schonian,

    Affiliation: Institute of Microbiology and Hygiene, Charite University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    X
  • Jean Claude Dujardin,

    Affiliation: Unit of Molecular Parasitology, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

    X
  • Poonam Salotra mail

    salotra@vsnl.com

    Affiliation: National Institute of Pathology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, India

    X
  • Published: May 22, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001657

Abstract

Background

With widespread resistance to antimonials in Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) in the Indian subcontinent, Miltefosine (MIL) has been introduced as the first line therapy. Surveillance of MIL susceptibility in natural populations of Leishmania donovani is vital to preserve it and support the VL elimination program.

Methodology and Principal Findings

We measured in vitro susceptibility towards MIL and paromomycin (PMM) in L. donovani isolated from VL and PKDL, pre- and post-treatment cases, using an amastigote-macrophage model. MIL susceptibility of post-treatment isolates from cured VL cases (n = 13, mean IC50±SD = 2.43±1.44 µM), was comparable (p>0.05) whereas that from relapses (n = 3, mean IC50 = 4.72±1.99 µM) was significantly higher (p = 0.04) to that of the pre-treatment group (n = 6, mean IC50 = 1.86±0.75 µM). In PKDL, post-treatment isolates (n = 3, mean IC50 = 16.13±2.64 µM) exhibited significantly lower susceptibility (p = 0.03) than pre-treatment isolates (n = 5, mean IC50 = 8.63±0.94 µM). Overall, PKDL isolates (n = 8, mean IC50 = 11.45±4.19 µM) exhibited significantly higher tolerance (p<0.0001) to MIL than VL isolates (n = 22, mean IC50 = 2.58±1.58 µM). Point mutations in the miltefosine transporter (LdMT) and its beta subunit (LdRos3) genes previously reported in parasites with experimentally induced MIL resistance were not present in the clinical isolates. Further, the mRNA expression profile of these genes was comparable in the pre- and post-treatment isolates. Parasite isolates from VL and PKDL cases were uniformly susceptible to PMM with respective mean IC50 = 7.05±2.24 µM and 6.18±1.51 µM.

Conclusion

The in vitro susceptibility of VL isolates remained unchanged at the end of MIL treatment; however, isolates from relapsed VL and PKDL cases had lower susceptibility than the pre-treatment isolates. PKDL isolates were more tolerant towards MIL in comparison with VL isolates. All parasite isolates were uniformly susceptible to PMM. Mutations in the LdMT and LdRos3 genes as well as changes in the expression of these genes previously correlated with experimental resistance to MIL could not be verified for the field isolates.

Author Summary

Resistance to antimonials has emerged as a major hurdle to the treatment and control of VL and led to the introduction of Miltefosine as first line treatment in the Indian subcontinent. MIL is an oral drug with a long half-life, and it is feared that resistance may emerge rapidly, threatening control efforts under the VL elimination program. There is an urgent need for monitoring treatment efficacy and emergence of drug resistance in the field. In a set of VL/PKDL cases recruited for MIL treatment, we observed comparable drug susceptibility in pre- and post-treatment isolates from cured VL patients while MIL susceptibility was significantly reduced in isolates from VL relapse and PKDL cases. The PKDL isolates showed higher tolerance to MIL as compared to VL isolates. Both VL and PKDL isolates were uniformly susceptible to PMM. MIL transporter genes LdMT/LdRos3 were previously reported as potential resistance markers in strains in which MIL resistance was experimentally induced. The point mutations and the down-regulated expression of these transporters observed in vitro could, however, not be verified in natural populations of parasites. LdMT/LdRos3 genes therefore, do not appear to be suitable markers so far for monitoring drug susceptibility in clinical leishmanial isolates.

Introduction

Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) is a potentially fatal protozoan infection with members of the Leishmania donovani complex as the causative species. This poverty related disease is endemic in 70 countries with a total of 200 million people at risk and an estimated 100,000 new infections annually concerning all age groups [1], [2]. More than 90% of the estimated VL cases occur in India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sudan and Brazil [3] with India alone sharing almost 50% of the world's total disease burden. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a dermal sequel of VL that develops in 5–15% of the cured VL patients in India and in 60% cured VL patients in Sudan and is considered to constitute a major parasite reservoir in these regions. In the present situation, chemotherapy is the key strategy for VL control due to the absence of vaccines and the limited impact of vector control [4][6]. The situation is particularly grave in Bihar, India, where more than 60% of VL patients do not respond to traditional first line antimonial therapy. The use of Amphotericin B and its liposomal formulations, although highly effective even in antimony unresponsive patients, has limitations because of its renal toxicity, high costs and inconvenience due to slow I.V. based administration [7], [8].

The first oral antileishmanial drug Miltefosine (MIL), an alkylphosphocholine, has proved to be highly effective against VL with cure rates of 94%, including cases unresponsive to antimony [2], [9]. It was therefore, proposed as the first line VL therapy and remains the mainstay in the Kala-azar elimination program, that aims to reduce the incidence of VL to 0.0001% in the endemic areas of the Indian subcontinent by the year 2015 [10], [11]. Efficacy of MIL has also been established for the treatment of PKDL in India [12], [13]. In absence of directly observed therapy (DOT), widespread misuse of this self-administered drug could contribute to the rapid emergence of MIL resistance in the field. Moreover, phase IV trial of MIL in India suggested doubling of the relapse and failure rate compared to phase III trials [8], [14]. Treatment failures (almost all relapses) were recently also observed in Nepal [15]. Alarmingly, VL and PKDL treatment failure and relapse cases have already surfaced in a significant fraction of MIL treated patients in India (unpublished data). Unresponsiveness to MIL has been reported for cutaneous cases due to L. braziliensis and Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in South America [16], [17]. Paromomycin (PMM) is an aminoglycoside antibiotic exhibiting high efficacy towards VL [18]. Data from Phase IV trials confirm the safety and efficacy of PMM to treat VL [19].

The development and spread of drug resistance has made surveillance of drug susceptibility a high priority. In the present investigation, through long-term monitoring of MIL treated VL/PKDL patients, post-treatment stage parasite isolates were obtained either as residual parasites soon after completion of treatment or from cases that relapsed, and were compared to a set of pre-treatment isolates. The MIL susceptibility of these isolates was assessed with an in vitro intracellular amastigote assay and correlated with the clinical outcome. In addition, intrinsic sensitivity towards PMM was evaluated in the same set of clinical isolates in order to obtain baseline susceptibility prior to its future use in therapy.

An impaired functioning of P-Type ATPase transporters, the LdMT–LdRos3-dependent flippase machinery, resulting in a significant decrease of intracellular MIL concentration was observed in experimentally induced MIL resistant leishmanial parasites. [20], [21]. The resistant phenotype was related to the occurrence of two missense and a nonsense point mutations in the LdMT gene, and a nonsense mutation in the start codon of the LdRos3 gene. In our study, we have evaluated the presence of these mutations and the mRNA expression levels of LdMT and LdRos3 in our set of clinical isolates to explore their role as molecular markers for monitoring MIL susceptibility in the field.

Methods

Patients and parasites

Clinical isolates of L. donovani were prepared from splenic aspirates of VL patients reporting to KAMRC, Muzzafarpur, Bihar or from dermal lesions of PKDL patients reporting to Department of Dermatology, Safdarjung Hospital (SJH), New Delhi under the guidelines of the Ethical Committee of the respective Institute. All patients came from zones of high endemicity in Bihar, India. VL patients received MIL treatment for 28 days (50 mg capsule twice) while PKDL patients received MIL for 60 days (50 mg capsule, thrice daily). Splenic smears from all VL patients were examined microscopically at the pre and post-treatment stages. Patients with negative or +1 smear grade were not treated further. However, patients with smears grading ≥2 [22] were treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate.

Parasites isolated before onset of treatment were assigned XXX/0 codes. MIL treatment led to complete subsidence of VL symptoms, interpreted as clinical cure, although residual parasites could be cultured from splenic aspirates in a substantial number of patients at the end of 1 month of treatment. These post-treatment isolates were assigned with XXX/1 codes. All cases were followed up for one year. VL and PKDL cases that relapsed after an initial cure were treated with Amphotericin B and cured. Parasites were isolated from each of the relapse cases at the time of reported relapse (after four, six and seven months of MIL treatment completion in VL and after 12, 18 and 32 months of MIL treatment in PKDL and were designated as XXX/month in which relapse occurred.

Parasites were routinely grown in Medium 199 (Sigma) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HI FBS, Gibco, USA) at 25°C.

Species characterization

Parasite DNA, isolated using Qiagen Kit, was subjected to ITS-1 PCR-RFLP analysis for species characterization, as described earlier [23]. The ITS1 PCR product was digested with 1 U HaeIII enzyme (Genei, Bangalore, India) at 37°C for 2 hours, followed by analysis on 2% agarose gel. All isolates were characterized as L. donovani on the basis of their RFLP pattern.

Drug susceptibility assay at intracellular amastigote stage

The drug susceptibility of L. donovani parasites was assessed as intracellular amastigotes, as previously described [24]. Briefly, J774A.1 cells (1×105 cells/ml) were infected with stationary phase promastigotes at ratio of 10 : 1 (parasite : macrophage), plated into 16 well chambered Labtek tissue culture slides and incubated for 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Excess, non-adhered promastigotes were removed by washing and macrophages incubated for 18–24 h. Infected cells were re-incubated for 48 h, with MIL (1, 5, 10, 20 and 30 µM) (Paladin) or PMM (1, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 µM) (Gland Pharma). Macrophages were then examined for intracellular amastigotes after staining with Diff-Quik solutions. The number of L. donovani amastigotes was counted in 100 macrophages, at 100× magnification. The survival rate of parasites relative to untreated macrophages was calculated and IC50 were determined by sigmoid regression analysis. The assays were performed in duplicate and repeated at least twice.

Partial sequencing of LdMT and LdRos3 genes

Fourteen parasite isolates were tested for the presence of previously described point mutations in the LdMT gene, at positions T421N, L856P and W210*, and the LdRos3 gene, at position M1*(Figure S1) [20], [21]. Primers were designed targeting these mutations and their adjacent regions using Primer 3 software [25]. PCR reactions were performed with 35 ng of genomic DNA in a 50 µl reaction volume containing 10× PCR buffer (incl. 15 mM MgCl2), 5 U/µl of Taq polymerase (Roche), 2.5 mM dNTPs (NEB), and 10 µM of each of the locus specific primers (Table S1). Thermocycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing with the specific primer pair at the specific TA°C for 30 sec and extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension step at 72°C for 6 min. PCR products with fragment sizes between 149 and 277 bp were purified (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen) and sent for commercial sequencing using forward and reverse primers (SMB Services in Molecular Biology, Berlin Germany). Sequences were checked, trimmed and aligned using Chromas Pro v 1.32 [26].

RNA extraction and real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA (5 µg), isolated from stationary phase promastigotes at day six using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) was reverse transcribed at 42°C with M-MLV Reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) after deoxyribonuclease I treatment. All real-time PCR reactions were performed in duplicate in 25 µl volumes using SYBR Green as described before [27]. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to calculate relative changes in gene expression determined from real-time quantitative PCR experiments. The data was presented as the fold change in the target gene expression in L.donovani parasites normalized to the internal control gene (GAPDH) and relative to the LdAG83 reference strain of L. donovani.

Ethical statement

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India. Written informed consent was obtained from patients and from guardians in case of children <18 years.

Results

In vitro susceptibility to MIL

MIL susceptibility was determined at intracellular amastigote stage for thirty clinical isolates, including eleven pre-treatment isolates (six from VL and five from PKDL cases), thirteen post-treatment isolates (obtained at the end of treatment from VL patients which depicted a clinical cure, although parasitology was still positive) and six relapse isolates (three VL and three PKDL). The clinical profile of patients and in vitro susceptibility of the isolates to MIL are summarized in Table 1.

thumbnail

Table 1. Drug susceptibility of Leishmania donovani clinical isolates following Miltefosine treatment in cases of Visceral Leishmaniasis and Post kala-azar dermal Leishmaniasis.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001657.t001

The six VL pre-treatment isolates showed a sensitivity range of 0.95±0.06 to 2.91±0.24 µM towards MIL with the mean IC50±SD being 1.86±0.75 µM (Figure 1). The post-treatment VL isolates had a mean IC50 of 2.43±1.44 µM (range 1.02±0.17 to 5.20±0.80 µM) which was not significantly different in comparison with the pre-treatment group (p>0.05). The mean IC50 of the three VL isolates from relapse cases (4.72±1.99 µM) was significantly higher (p = 0.04) than that of pre-treatment VL cases (1.86±0.75 µM).

thumbnail

Figure 1. In vitro miltefosine susceptibility of parasite isolates from VL and PKDL cases before and after Mil treatment.

Sensitivity of VL and PKDL isolates at intracellular amastigote stage were determined by infection in murine macrophage cell line J774A.1. Each individual value represents mean IC50±SD of the results from two separate assays.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001657.g001

The three PKDL relapse isolates showed a significantly higher (p = 0.03), mean IC50 of 16.13±2.64 µM in comparison with the pre-treatment PKDL isolates (mean IC50 = 8.63±0.94 µM). The mean susceptibility of all VL isolates (2.58±1.58 µM, n = 22) when compared with PKDL isolates (11.45±4.19 µM, n = 8) revealed that the latter were significantly (p<0.0001) more tolerant to MIL (Figure 1).

Natural susceptibility of L. donovani isolates to PMM

We evaluated PMM susceptibility of 22 VL isolates, of which 16 were exposed to MIL treatment. The IC50 ranged from 3.41±0.29 to 10.70±1.12 µM with mean IC50 = 7.05±2.24 µM (Table 1). Furthermore, the PMM sensitivity was similar (p>0.05) in parasites non-exposed (mean IC50 = 7.73±2.25 µM) or exposed (mean IC50 = 6.79±2.25 µM) to MIL (Figure 2).

thumbnail

Figure 2. PMM susceptibility profile of VL and PKDL isolates exposed or non-exposed to MIL treatment.

Susceptibility of VL and PKDL isolates at intracellular amastigote stage was determined by infection in murine macrophage cell line J774A.1. Each individual value represents mean IC50±SD of the results from two separate assays.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001657.g002

The inherent PMM susceptibility of 8 PKDL isolates ranged from 4.92±0.34 to 8.62±1.82 µM (Table 1). Like in VL, the PMM IC50 of PKDL isolates was similar (p>0.05) in parasites non-exposed (n = 5, mean IC50 = 6.12±1.40 µM) or exposed (n = 3, mean IC50 = 6.29±2.02 µM) to MIL (Figure 2). There was no correlation observed between MIL and PMM susceptibility in VL (r = 0.10) or PKDL isolates (r = −0.02).

Point mutations in the LdMT and LdRos3 genes possibly related to MIL resistance

None of the four reported SNPs in the LdMT and LdRos3 genes, which were suggested to be responsible for the resistant phenotype in a strain from Ethiopia, MHOM/ET/1967/HU3_MIL-R, with experimentally induced MIL resistance [21], could be detected in the clinical isolates investigated (Figure S1). Furthermore, no SNPs were detected when the three LdMT and the LdRos3 gene fragments were sequenced in 15 clinical isolates from Nepalese VL cases that relapsed after MIL treatment (data not shown). Notably, the LdRos3 gene fragment could not be amplified for the strains BHU800/1 and BHU1062/4 although no sequence polymorphisms were identified in the primer annealing sites.

Expression of markers of experimental MIL resistance in field isolates

mRNA expression level of LdMT and LdRos3 was analyzed in 19 VL and two PKDL isolates using real-time PCR in comparison to the reference strain L. donovani LdAG83. The expression was found comparable in all the groups including the relapse cases of VL and PKDL (Figure 3).

thumbnail

Figure 3. Expression of LdMT and LdRos3 in clinical isolates of VL and PKDL.

Real-time reverse-transcription PCR expression analysis of L. donovani MIL transporter genes (LdMT and LdRos3) was performed using GAPDH as internal control. Graph shows the expression index, defined as ratio of gene expression relative to that of strain LdAG83. Data represent the mean±SD of the results of three independent experiments.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001657.g003

Discussion

The introduction of MIL therapy as treatment for VL has pioneered the era of effective oral therapy for this potentially fatal disease. However, anthroponotic VL transmission in the Indian subcontinent and the long half life of MIL (150–200 h) poses the risk of development of resistance in natural population of parasites. It has been reported earlier that MIL resistant parasites can be easily generated in vitro [28]. The present study reveals for the first time, the intrinsic in vitro sensitivity of Indian L. donovani isolates from a set of VL and PKDL patients treated with MIL (including both responders and relapse cases). The data provides information on the extent of MIL-tolerance in natural populations following MIL treatment highlighting the need for adequate monitoring of drug susceptibility to preserve this valuable drug.

The drug susceptibility of the currently prevailing clinical isolates was similar to the L. donovani parasites from the era of pre- MIL treatment reported earlier [27]. At the end of MIL treatment all cases showed clinical cure although some of them were parasitologically positive and residual parasites could be cultured from splenic aspirates of such patients (Table 1). The drug susceptibility of L. donovani parasites isolated at the end of therapy was comparable to that of pre-treatment isolates. On the contrary, parasites obtained from the cases that relapsed exhibited significantly reduced susceptibility to MIL, although the IC50 values were below the expected serum threshold levels [29], implicating the possible involvement of host factors in rendering tolerance to drug. Indeed, reports on VL relapse in HIV co-infected patients treated with MIL suggest that host immunity plays a role in the elimination of parasites from VL patients [30], [31]. A small number of MIL treated cases showed relapse, parasite isolates from these were monitored for in vitro drug susceptibility. Although we did not find any clinically resistant strains, the observation of strains with higher MIL tolerance (up to eight times compared to the sensitive ones) emphasizes the need for close monitoring of cases under MIL treatment. The study also investigated for the first time, the intrinsic susceptibility of PKDL isolates towards MIL. The in vitro susceptibility of PKDL isolates was significantly higher in pre-treatment isolates than in isolates originating from relapse patients, which were exposed to MIL for long duration (over two months). The IC50 of PKDL isolates was significantly higher (~4 fold) compared to VL isolates, a trend similar to that reported earlier for SAG susceptibility in isolates from high endemic regions [32]. This reduced drug susceptibility of PKDL isolates may be due to longer treatment regime in PKDL and prolonged exposure of parasites to the drug. PMM exhibited similar in vitro susceptibility in pre- and post-treatment isolates suggesting its potential in future VL and PKDL therapy.

The inactivation of the genes essential for MIL uptake has been proposed as the simplest mechanism of resistance towards the drug and L. donovani MIL transporter LdMT and its subunit LdRos3 have been reported as markers of experimental MIL resistance [28]. Experimentally induced MIL resistant L.donovani showed down regulated expression of these transporters [27].

In the current study, a selection of strains from Indian L. donovani with variable response to MIL treatment has been tested for four point mutations that were suggested to underlie the development of MIL resistance. No nucleotide exchanges were however, detected in the LdMT and LdRos3 gene fragments sequenced for the set of clinical isolates studied herein, or for clinical isolates from Nepalese MIL relapse cases (data not shown). Screening of whole-genome data revealed that both genes are highly conserved for the examined strains of L. donovani from the North of the Indian subcontinent, regardless whether they were isolated from cases responding or not responding to MIL treatment [33]. Comparison of the expression of LdMT and LdRos3 genes revealed a similar expression profile in the different groups of isolates studied herein. Further studies in truly resistant parasites from MIL treated cases, when available, are necessary to explore the possible utility of these genes as markers for monitoring drug susceptibility in clinical isolates. In conclusion, the causative forces leading to MIL resistance cannot be explained by the genomic data available up to date and it is very likely that multi-factorial events may be responsible for the tolerance to chemotherapeutics in L. donovani [33].

The study employed an amastigote-macrophage model for monitoring drug susceptibility towards MIL as this stage mimics the host milieu. However, amastigote assays are tedious, time consuming and technically demanding. Hence, drug sensitivity assays based on promastigotes, if found relevant, would be better as simplified biological tool that can be used in clinical settings. The current data recommends for keeping miltefosine susceptibility under close surveillance in the field. The risk of relapse after MIL therapy presses the need for maintenance regimen such as DOT for this oral drug and exploring new drug combinations for regions endemic for VL. Regional policies concerning judicious use of the drug and monitoring the treatment outcome should be implemented and supervised by the health authorities in the endemic areas to minimize the risk of emergence of MIL resistant strains. The development of markers to identify drug unresponsiveness at an early stage constitutes an essential step towards the elimination of this poverty driven disease.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Alignments of sequences for four mutations in the MIL transporter genes potentially linked to in vitro resistance. The wild-type of the reference strain (MHOM/ET/1967/HU3) is represented in blue color and the reference strain (MHOM/ET/1967/HU3_M) in which miltefosine resistance was experimentally induced in red color. Identified point mutations are labelled in green for verified SNPs previously described. Additional point mutations are marked yellow. Note that BHU902/1 and BHU800/1 could not be amplified with primers designed for locus LdRos3. A) Alignment for locus G630A in the putative Leishmania donovani miltefosine transporter. B) Alignment for locus G1261T in the putative Leishmania donovani miltefosine transporter. C) Alignment for locus T2567C in the putative Leishmania donovani miltefosine transporter. D) Alignment for locus G3T in the putative Leishmania donovani miltefosine transporter beta subunit (LdRos3).

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001657.s001

(DOC)

Table S1.

Primer sets employed to test for the point mutations of interest.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001657.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr Robert Vinson from Paladin for kindly providing Miltefosine and to Gland Pharma for providing Paromomycin. We thank Carola Schweynoch for excellent technical assistance in the sequencing experiments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: VB AK SS GS JCD PS. Performed the experiments: VB AK DKD OS. Analyzed the data: VB AK DKD OS GS JCD VR SS PS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: VKP SS VR GS JCD PS. Wrote the paper: VB AK OS GS JCD PS.

References

  1. 1. Guerin PJ, Olliaro P, Sundar S, Boelaert M, Croft SL, et al. (2002) Visceral leishmaniasis: current status of control, diagnosis, and treatment, and a proposed research and development agenda. Lancet Infect Dis 2: 494–501.
  2. 2. WHO (2010) Expert Committee on Control of the leishmaniases. WHO Technical Report Series.
  3. 3. WHO (2007) Expert Committee Available: http//www.who.int/Leishmaniasis/en.
  4. 4. Jha TK, Sundar S, Thakur CP, Felton JM, Sabin AJ, et al. (2005) A phase II dose-ranging study of sitamaquine for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73: 1005–1011.
  5. 5. Olliaro PL, Guerin PJ, Gerstl S, Haaskjold AA, Rottingen JA, et al. (2005) Treatment options for visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review of clinical studies done in India, 1980–2004. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 763–774.
  6. 6. Sundar S, Chatterjee M (2006) Visceral leishmaniasis - current therapeutic modalities. Indian J Med Res 123: 345–352.
  7. 7. Sundar S, Rai M (2002) Advances in the treatment of leishmaniasis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 15: 593–598.
  8. 8. Sundar S, Rai M (2005) Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 6: 2821–2829.
  9. 9. Sundar S, Jha TK, Thakur CP, Engel J, Sindermann H, et al. (2002) Oral miltefosine for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. N Engl J Med 347: 1739–1746.
  10. 10. WHO (2005) Expert Committee on Regional Strategic Framework for Elimination of Kala-azar from the South-East Asia Region (2005–2015). New Delhi: WHO regional Office for South- East Asia.
  11. 11. Joshi A, Narain JP, Prasittisuk , Bhatia R, Hashim G, et al. (2008) Kala-azar status in SEA Region. J Vector Borne Dis 45: 105–111.
  12. 12. Sundar S, Kumar K, Chakravarty J, Agrawal D, Agrawal S, et al. (2006) Cure of antimony-unresponsive Indian post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis with oral miltefosine. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 100: 698–700.
  13. 13. Ramesh V, Katara GK, Verma S, Salotra P (2011) Miltefosine as an effective choice in the treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Br J Dermatol 165: 411–414.
  14. 14. Sundar S, Murray HW (2005) Availability of miltefosine for the treatment of kala-azar in India. Bull World Health Organ 83: 394–395.
  15. 15. Pandey BD, Pandey K, Kaneko O, Yanagi T, Hirayama K (2009) Relapse of visceral leishmaniasis after miltefosine treatment in a Nepalese patient. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 580–582.
  16. 16. Sanchez-Canete MP, Carvalho L, Perez-Victoria FJ, Gamarro F, Castanys S (2009) Low plasma membrane expression of the miltefosine transport complex renders Leishmania braziliensis refractory to the drug. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 1305–1313.
  17. 17. Chrusciak-Talhari A, Dietze R, Chrusciak Talhari C, da Silva RM, Gadelha Yamashita EP, et al. (2011) Randomized controlled clinical trial to access efficacy and safety of miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in Manaus, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 84: 255–260.
  18. 18. Sundar S, Jha TK, Thakur CP, Sinha PK, Bhattacharya SK (2007) Injectable paromomycin for visceral leishmaniasis in India. N Engl J Med 356: 2571–2581.
  19. 19. Sinha PK, Jha TK, Thakur CP, Nath D, Mukherjee S, et al. (2011) Phase 4 pharmacovigilance trial of paromomycin injection for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in India. J Trop Med. doi:10.1155/2011/645203.
  20. 20. Perez-Victoria FJ, Castanys S, Gamarro F (2003) Leishmania donovani resistance to miltefosine involves a defective inward translocation of the drug. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47: 2397–2403.
  21. 21. Perez-Victoria FJ, Sanchez-Canete MP, Castanys S, Gamarro F (2006) Phospholipid translocation and miltefosine potency require both L. donovani miltefosine transporter and the new protein LdRos3 in Leishmania parasites. J Biol Chem 281: 23766–23775.
  22. 22. Chulay JD, Bryceson ADM (1983) Quantitation of amastigotes of Leishmania donovani in smears of splenic aspirates from patients with visceral leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 32(3): 475–479.
  23. 23. Kumar R, Bumb RA, Ansari NA, Mehta RD, Salotra P (2007) Cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica in Bikaner, India: parasite identification and characterization using molecular and immunologic tools. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 896–901.
  24. 24. Kulshrestha A, Singh R, Kumar D, Negi NS, Salotra P (2011) Antimony-resistant clinical isolates of Leishmania donovani are susceptible to paromomycin and sitamaquine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 2916–2921.
  25. 25. Rozen SS, Skaletsky HJ (1998) Primer3. Available: http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/genome_soft​ware/other/primer3.html.
  26. 26. Chromas Chromas Pro Software Version 1.32. Available: www.technelysium.com.au/chromas.html.
  27. 27. Kumar D, Kulshrestha A, Singh R, Salotra P (2009) In vitro susceptibility of field isolates of Leishmania donovani to Miltefosine and amphotericin B: correlation with sodium antimony gluconate susceptibility and implications for treatment in areas of endemicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 835–838.
  28. 28. Seifert K, Matu S, Javier Perez-Victoria F, Castanys S, Gamarro F, et al. (2003) Characterisation of Leishmania donovani promastigotes resistant to hexadecylphosphocholine (miltefosine). Int J Antimicrob Agents 22: 380–387.
  29. 29. Berman J (2005) Miltefosine to treat leishmaniasis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 6: 1381–1388.
  30. 30. Sindermann H, Engel KR, Fischer C, Bommer W (2004) Oral miltefosine for leishmaniasis in immunocompromised patients: compassionate use in 39 patients with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 39: 1520–1523.
  31. 31. Troya J, Casquero A, Refoyo E, Fernandez-Guerrero ML, Gorgolas M (2008) Long term failure of miltefosine in the treatment of refractory visceral leishmaniasis in AIDS patients. Scand J Infect Dis 40: 78–80.
  32. 32. Singh R, Kumar D, Ramesh V, Negi NS, Singh S, et al. (2006) Visceral leishmaniasis, or kala azar (KA): high incidence of refractoriness to antimony is contributed by anthroponotic transmission via post-KA dermal leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis 194: 302–306.
  33. 33. Downing T, Imamura H, Decuypere S, Clark TG, Coombs GH, et al. (2011) Whole genome sequencing of multiple Leishmania donovani clinical isolates provides insights into population structure and mechanisms of drug resistance. Genome Res 21: 2143–2156.