Advertisement
Research Article

Trypanosoma cruzi I and IV Stocks from Brazilian Amazon Are Divergent in Terms of Biological and Medical Properties in Mice

  • Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro mail,

    wueltonmm@ibest.com.br

    Affiliations: Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, University of the State of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil

    X
  • Ana Paula Margioto Teston,

    Affiliation: State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

    X
  • Ana Paula Gruendling,

    Affiliation: State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

    X
  • Daniele dos Reis,

    Affiliation: State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

    X
  • Mônica Lúcia Gomes,

    Affiliation: State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

    X
  • Silvana Marques de Araújo,

    Affiliation: State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

    X
  • Maria Terezinha Bahia,

    Affiliation: Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    X
  • Laylah Kelre Costa Magalhães,

    Affiliations: Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, University of the State of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil

    X
  • Jorge Augusto de Oliveira Guerra,

    Affiliations: Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, University of the State of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil

    X
  • Henrique Silveira,

    Affiliations: Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, University of the State of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Institute, Center of Malaria and other Tropical Diseases, New University of Lisbone, Lisbone, Portugal

    X
  • Max Jean de Ornelas Toledo,

    Affiliation: State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

    X
  • Maria das Graças Vale Barbosa

    Affiliations: Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, University of the State of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, Nilton Lins Universitary Center, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil

    X
  • Published: February 21, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002069

Abstract

Background

In the Brazilian Amazon, clinical and epidemiological frameworks of Chagas disease are very dissimilar in relation to the endemic classical areas of transmission, possibly due to genetic and biological characteristics of the circulating Trypanosoma cruzi stocks. Twenty six T. cruzi stocks from Western Amazon Region attributed to the TcI and TcIV DTUs were comparatively studied in Swiss mice to test the hypothesis that T. cruzi clonal structure has a major impact on its biological and medical properties.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Seventeen parameters were assayed in mice infected with 14 T. cruzi strains belonging to DTU TcI and 11 strains typed as TcIV. In comparison with TcI, TcIV stocks promoted a significantly shorter pre-patent period (p<0.001), a longer patent period (p<0.001), higher values of mean daily parasitemia (p = 0.009) and maximum of parasitemia (p = 0.015), earlier days of maximum parasitemia (p<0.001) and mortality (p = 0.018), higher mortality rates in the acute phase (p = 0.047), higher infectivity rates (p = 0.002), higher positivity in the fresh blood examination (p<0.001), higher positivity in the ELISA at the early chronic phase (p = 0.022), and a higher positivity in the ELISA at the late chronic phase (p = 0.003). On the other hand TcI showed higher values of mortality rates in the early chronic phase (p = 0.014), higher frequency of mice with inflammatory process in any organ (p = 0.005), higher frequency of mice with tissue parasitism in any organ (p = 0.027) and a higher susceptibility to benznidazole (p = 0.002) than TcIV. Survival analysis showing the time elapsed from the day of inoculation to the beginning of the patent period was significantly shorter for TcIV strains and the death episodes triggered following the infection with TcI occurred significantly later in relation to TcIV. The notable exceptions come from positivity in the hemocultures and PCR, for which the results were similar.

Conclusion/Significance

T. cruzi stocks belonging to TcI and TcIV DTUs from Brazilian Amazon are divergent in terms of biological and medical properties in mice.

Author Summary

Chagas disease is caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, constituting an important health problem in the American Continent. In the Brazilian Amazon, Chagas disease has been recognized as an emerging problem. There are few studies exploring the genetic and biological framework of stocks of T. cruzi from the Western Brazilian Amazon, where Chagas disease has a profile of lower morbidity and mortality, appearing mainly in the chronic latent form. Here, we carried out the biological characterization in mice of T. cruzi isolates belonging to TcI and TcIV DTUs from the State of Amazonas, Western Brazilian Amazon. T. cruzi stocks belonging to TcI and TcIV DTUs from Brazilian Amazon are divergent in terms of biological and medical properties in mice, with a higher virulence for the latter DTU as revealed by several biological parameters. Results strongly support the working hypothesis that biological differences are proportional to the evolutionary divergence among the DTUs, and highlight the need to take into account the phylogenetic diversity of T. cruzi natural stocks circulating in the emergent areas for Chagas disease in all applied studies dealing with clinical diversity of Chagas disease, immunology, diagnosis, prognosis, and drug and vaccine trials.

Introduction

Chagas disease is an important health problem, affecting 8–9 million individuals, with approximately 50,000 new cases annually, in Central and Latin America [1]. The illness is caused by Trypanosoma cruzi and has a variable clinical course that may include symptomless infection, overwhelming acute disease or a severe chronic condition. The latter may be hallmarked by cardiovascular and/or gastrointestinal involvement. In the search for improved sources of income, agriculture, livestock rearing, and other socioeconomic activities, human populations began migrating into the natural wild habitats where T. cruzi infection was enzootic [2]. Currently, poverty, poor housing and sub-standard living conditions and deforestation promote an incipient adaptation of triatomine vectors to both humans and domestic animals, with increased efficiencies of the wild, domestic, and peridomestic cycles of T. cruzi transmission in the areas where Chagas disease emerges [2], [3]. Furthermore, oral transmission through contaminated food is now considered an important route of transmission [4].

Trypanosoma cruzi is a heterogeneous taxon with multiple hosts, vectors and routes of infection (for a review, see [5]). Multilocus genotyping consistently reveals six ‘discrete typing units’ (DTUs) [6], named as TcI to TcVI in the last T. cruzi nomenclature consensus held in Brazil [7]. TcII, TcV and TcVI predominate in the domestic transmission cycles in the South Cone of South America, where patients may present severe acute disease with chronic cardiac and/or digestive involvement [8]. In the Brazilian Amazon, Venezuela, Colombia, Central and North America, TcI is the predominant DTU and the major cause of both acute and cardiac Chagas' disease, but also is reported from chagasic patients sporadically throughout the Southern Cone [9][12]. Unexpectedly, TcI was reported beside TcII, TcIII, TcIV and TcV strains in Mexico, at a relatively high frequency in Triatoma dimidiata [13]. TcIII is infrequent from domestic sources and circulates in terrestrial transmission cycles associated with Dasypus novemcinctus mainly throughout South America, causing at least three reported cases of Chagas' disease [14][16]. TcIV is found in Amazonia and Southern North America, most frequently isolated from primates and recently this DTU was associated to Chagas' disease in the Brazilian Amazon [17] and Venezuela [18].

To understand the diverse phenotypic differences among different T. cruzi strains and the potential connection between that variability and different manifestations of Chagas disease, it is essential to have a correct reconstruction of the evolutionary history of T. cruzi. There is solid evidence that T. cruzi genetic structure is the outcome of recombination events detected as the presence of naturally occurring hybrids [19], mitochondrial introgression [17], [19] and a capacity for genetic exchange in the laboratory [20], occurring more commonly within epidemiologically linked strains [21]. Likewise, clonal diversity among humans, reservoir hosts and vectors suggested complex patterns of superinfection and/or coinfection in oral and vector-borne Chagas' disease cases [22]. Advances in the comprehension of the molecular epidemiology of Chagas' disease and geographic distribution of the six DTUs were not accompanied by a similar effort to straightforwardly elucidate the biological framework of the stocks and clones studied both in the vertebrate hosts and vectors. Some ancient studies have confirmed that T. cruzi genetic diversity is correlated with the intrinsic characteristics of the parasite such as the behavior in vitro [23], [24], in the vector [25], and in the vertebrate host, namely virulence [26], pathological alterations and tropism toward specific organs [26], [27].

In the Brazilian Amazon Region, Chagas' disease has been recognized as an important and emerging problem. The epidemiological situation of Chagas' disease in this region, where enzootic T. cruzi transmission cycles involve a great diversity of vectors and reservoir hosts [4], [28], suitably illustrates the concerns about the consolidation of Chagas' disease control. Adventitious adult triatomines maintain continuous, low-intensity transmission in rural settings; as a result, human infection is hypo-endemic in the region, with about 100,000 to 300,000 people chronically carrying T. cruzi [4]. Sylvatic triatomines are also involved in localized disease outbreaks related to oral T. cruzi transmission via contaminated foodstuffs, and account for the relatively high infection prevalence (4–5%) reported among extractivist forest workers such as piaçava palm fiber collectors [4], [28]. In this region a few cases of chronic Chagas' disease were reported, appearing uniquely as miocardiopathy without records of digestive tract pathology [29]. So far there is no information about the DTUs responsible for chronic cases in the Brazilian Amazon. Isolates from patients with acute Chagas' disease were typed as TcI and Z3 (TcIII or TcIV) in the state of Pará [30] and as TcIV in two outbreaks in the state of Amazonas [17].

The diverse clinical outcome of human T. cruzi infection has been attributed to the genetic heterogeneity of parasite populations and to the host's genetic background [31]. Miles et al. [9] have suggested that the variability of clinical manifestations of the disease could be in part explained by the parasite's genetic diversity. Knowledge on the parallel evolution between biological differences and genetic divergence among T. cruzi natural stocks is highly desirable because it may play an important role in comparative researches on the clinico-epidemiological and pathogenic perspectives. Predicting the clinical outcome of an infection based on the infecting DTU (and to what extent it is possible to do) is an important and worthy goal that needs previous comparative biology studies. The aim of this work is to carry out the biological characterization of T. cruzi isolates belonging to TcI and TcIV DTUs from the State of Amazonas, Western Brazilian Amazon.

Methods

Ethics statement

The use of stocks of T. cruzi obtained from patients has been approved by the Ethics in Research on Humans Committee of the Tropical Medicine Foundation of the State of Amazonas (approval number 360/07). Patients diagnosed with Chagas disease were treated according to the guidelines of the Brazilian Health Ministry. We obtained written informed consent from all participants involved in our study. Marsupials' captures and handling for blood sample collection were performed according to permits from the Brazilian Institute for Environment (approval number 1830651/07). Use of mice in this study and all the procedures using these animals were approved by the Ethics in Research on Animal Committee of the State University of Maringá (approval number 113/09). The procedures with the animals followed the ethical principles for animal use in research according to the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation.

Parasites stocks

All the stocks biologically characterized in this investigation were isolated from municipalities distantly located in the State of Amazonas (Fig. 1) and were genotyped previously as TcI or TcIV [17]. Molecular characterization was performed by PCR of the mini-exon [32] and ribosomal RNA [33] genes and by sequencing of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit II [34] and glucose-phosphate isomerase [20] genes. According to the T. cruzi nomenclature consensus [7], we included a set of fourteen stocks belonging to DTU TcI and a set of eleven stocks of the DTU TcIV. Information on the laboratory code, host, method of isolation, geographic origin, and DTU of these stocks is given in Table S1. For more details about these procedures see Monteiro et al. [17].

thumbnail

Figure 1. Geographic origin of the Trypanosoma cruzi strains from the State of Amazonas, Brazil.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002069.g001

The methods used in this work were summarized in the Figure S1.

Inoculation of mice

For each T. cruzi stock, a group of 20 male Swiss mice aged 21–28 days and weighting between 18 g and 20 g was used. All the animals were supplied by the central bioterium of the State University of Maringá and were kept under suitable temperature, humidity, and availability of water and food ad libitum. Inoculation was performed intraperitoneally and the inoculum was calculated according to Brener [35], ranging from 2,8×103 to 1.0×104 blood trypomastigotes per animal (Table S1). For experiments with thirteen stocks presenting subpatent parasitemia in Swiss mice, inoculum of metacyclic trypomastigotes from late-stationary-phase culture in LIT medium [36] was employed. We used an inoculum of 1,0×106 metacyclic trypomastigotes per animal for histopathological studies. The number of parasites was calculated by using a Neubauer chamber, with the subsequent calculation of the percentage of trypomastigotes in random counts of 500 forms on a Giemsa-stained slide (Table S1).

Parasitological parameters

The curve of parasitemia was based on the search on trypomastigotes forms in the bloodstream. Fresh blood examination (FBE) was daily carried out from the 3th day after inoculation (d.a.i.) until the test became negative for at least three consecutive days in the case of patent parasitemia or for a 30-day period in the case of subpatent parasitemia. Counting of parasites was performed on 5 µL of blood collected from the animal's tail as described by Brener [35]. In addition to determining the percentage of animals presenting positive FBE (%+FBE), mean pre-patent period (PPP), mean patent period (PP), mean daily parasitemia (MDP), maximum peak of parasitemia (Pmax) and day of maximum peak of parasitemia (DPmax) were obtained for each DTU [26].

Hemoculture (HC)

On the 55th d.a.i., 0.5 mL of blood was aseptically collected from the retro-orbital plexus and placed in two tubes containing 3 mL of LIT medium each, according to Filardi and Brener [37]. The cultures were kept at 28°C and monitored with microscopy for parasite growth at 30, 45, and 60 days after seeding. This technique allowed the percentage of mice presenting positive hemoculture (%+HC) to be obtained for each DTU.

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

For PCR, blood samples were obtained at the same time that HC was carried out. Two hundred microliters of blood from each animal was added to double the volume of 6.0 M/0.2 M guanidine/EDTA and stored at room temperature. The lysate was boiled for 7 min and the DNA extraction carried out in an aliquot of 100 µL using the Wincker et al. [38] protocol as modified by Gomes et al. [39]. The DNA solution was then washed with 70% ethanol prior to precipitation in order to remove potential PCR inhibitors. Finally, the DNA was re-suspended in 10 µL H2O MiliQ. During this stage, one negative and one positive control were added to each group of four samples. PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 11 µL, using 121 and 122 primers to amplify a specific fragment of 330 base pairs (bp) of kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) of T. cruzi. The reaction mixture was submitted to 35 amplification cycles with a thermocycler (Techne TC-512, UK), using 95°C for 1 min for denaturation with a longer initial time of 5 min, 65°C for 1 min for primer annealing, and 72°C for 1 min for extension with a final incubation at 72°C for 10 min. In this step, as a contamination control, two negative and two positive controls from the extraction step were added to every eight samples, and one negative and one positive control to the PCR. All the stages were carried out in separate environments with reagents, materials, and equipments exclusive to each area. The PCR products were visualized in 4.5% polyacrylamide silver-stained gel.

With the PCR results was obtained the parameter percentage of mice with positive PCR (%+PCR) for each DTU [40].

Infectivity and mortality

The infectivity rate (%INF) was calculated as the percentage of animals presenting positive FBE within the first two months following inoculation and/or positive HC and/or PCR on the 55th d.a.i. Cumulative mortality (%MOR) was recorded every day during the infection course, being calculated as the percentage of deaths observed in the acute (from inoculation until the 90th d.a.i) and chronic phases (from the 90th until the 180th d.a.i.). Day of maximum mortality (DMM) was determined by the mean of the day when occurred the deaths for each DTU.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

An ELISA modified according to Voller et al. [41] was used. Alkaline antigen of the T. cruzi Y (TcII) strain obtained in the exponential growth phase in LIT medium, and peroxidase-labeled anti-mouse immunoglobulin G conjugated (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, AL, USA) were used. Samples of serum collected in the early chronic phase (115th d.a.i.) and in the late chronic phase (205th d.a.i.) and diluted to 1:100 in phosphate-buffered saline, were used. The mean absorbance for 10 negative-control serum samples plus 2 standard deviations was used as the cut-off to discriminate positive and negative results.

With the ELISA results was obtained the parameter percentage of mice with positive ELISA (%+ELISA) for each DTU [40].

Susceptibility to benznidazole

After inoculation the animals were divided into two groups: 10 treated (T) and 10 untreated controls (NT). The first group was treated orally with daily doses of benznidazole (Lafepe, Brazil) 100 mg/kg of body weight for 20 consecutive days, starting of the 5th day after inoculation [37]. From the 3rd d.a.i. mice were subjected daily to FBE to confirm the infection and parasitemia record before treatment starting. Benznidazole was suspended in distilled water using Arabic gum and this suspension was administered by gavage.

Both T and NT groups were submitted to different diagnostic techniques for cure monitoring and determination of susceptibility to BZ. Mice with negative FBE, HC, PCR and ELISA results after completed treatment were considered cured [42]. Those with at least one positive result in any test were considered non-cured. The procedures for conducting these tests are the same as described in previous items.

The cure rate in animals inoculated with each stock and treated with benznidazole was obtained by the ratio between the number of animals considered cured and the total treated animals ×100. To determine the in vivo susceptibility of T. cruzi stocks to the chemotherapeutic agent was adopted criterion similar to Toledo et al. [42]: stocks with cure rates of 0% to 33% were resistant to the drug, those with cure rates between 34% and 67% were considered intermediate sensitivity and stocks with cure rates above 67% were considered sensitive to the drug.

Histopathological parameters

Histopathological analysis was carried out on animals from seven experiments with strains typed as TcI (AM28, AM38, AM41, AM49 and AM61) and TcIV (AM69 and AM70) using seven mice for each experiment. Infection was confirmed by FBE and/or HC. For each T. cruzi stock, all infected surviving mice were necropsied on the 90th d.a.i. for histopathological studies. The following organs and tissues were collected: (1) heart, (2) skeletal muscle, (3) lungs, (4) large intestine, (5) brain, (6) liver and (7) spleen. This material was routinely processed and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer sections of three blocks containing every organ of each mouse were obtained for further evaluation. These preparations were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for microscopic examination. The tissue parasitism (TP) and inflammatory process (IP) displayed by different organs or tissues were classified as absent, mild, moderate or severe. With these results was obtained the frequency of mice with inflammatory process and tissue parasitism for each DTU.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Normal distribution of data was evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Chi-square or Fisher's test was used to test differences in proportions, and Student t test was used to test differences in means. Levene's test was used to assess the equality of variances in different samples (DTUs). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed in order to detect differences in the time elapsed from the day of inoculation to the death episodes and the beginning of the patent period between mice inoculated with TcI and TcIV DTUs of T. cruzi. Log-rank test was used to test differences. Statistical significance was considered if p<0.05.

Results

Significant mean and frequency differences are apparent for biological properties in Swiss mice between the TcI and TcIV stocks. The statistical comparison evidenced that 15 out 17 parameters demonstrated significant differences between the DTUs (Tables 1 and 2). TcIV stocks promoted a significantly shorter PPP (p<0.001), a longer PP (p<0.001), higher values of MDP (p = 0.009) and Pmax (p = 0.015), and an earlier DMP (p<0.001) and DMM (p = 0.018), in comparison with TcI. A great standard deviation was observed in these biological parameters, mainly in PP, MDP, Pmax, and DMM showing that stocks of the same genetic lineage were not homogeneous in their characteristics (Table 1). Figure 2 shows how dissimilar are the curves of mean parasitemia built for TcI and TcIV strains and highlights the higher and earlier parasitemia observed for TcIV. Area under the curve was significantly greater for the set of TcIV strains (p<0.001).

thumbnail

Figure 2. Curves of mean parasitemia obtained from Trypanosoma cruzi I and IV strains.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002069.g002
thumbnail

Table 1. Mean values of biological parameters from Trypanosoma cruzi I and IV strains.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002069.t001
thumbnail

Table 2. Virulence parameters obtained in Swiss mice from Trypanosoma cruzi I and IV strains.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002069.t002

In the Table 2 are seen that TcIV stocks showed higher values of %MOR in the acute phase (p = 0.047), %INF (p = 0.002), %+FBE (p<0.001), %+ELISA in the early chronic phase (p = 0.022), and %+ELISA in the late chronic phase (p = 0.003) than the TcI strains. On the other hand TcI showed higher values of %MOR in the chronic phase (p = 0.014), frequency of mice with inflammatory process in any organ (p = 0.005), frequency of mice with tissue parasitism in any organ (p = 0.027) and susceptibility to benznidazole (p = 0.002) than TcIV. The notable exceptions come from parameters obtained through amplification methods of diagnosis (%+HC and %+PCR), for which no result is statistically significant (p<0.05) (Table 2). Stocks presenting resistance to benznidazole were found uniquely within TcIV stocks (3/10). Tissue parasitism and severe or moderate inflammatory process in the early chronic phase were recorded only in mice inoculated with TcI strains (Table 3). Amastigote nests were observed only in heart tissue and inflammatory process was observed in heart, skeletal muscle and brain.

thumbnail

Table 3. Number of mice infected with Trypanosoma cruzi I and IV strains presenting histopathological alterations.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002069.t003

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showing the time elapsed from the day of inoculation to the beginning of the patent period was significantly shorter for TcIV strains and the death episodes triggered following the infection with TcI occurred significantly later in relation to TcIV (Figure 3).

thumbnail

Figure 3. Survival analysis using patent period and time until death episodes for TcI and TcIV strains.

Panel A shows a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed in order to detect differences in the time elapsed from the day of inoculation to the death episodes and Panel B shows the same analysis from the day of inoculation to the beginning of the patent period, in mice inoculated with TcI and TcIV DTUs of T. cruzi. Log-rank test was used to test differences.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002069.g003

Discussion

Several studies of the properties of T. cruzi in cell and acellular cultures [23], [24], [43], virulence and pathogenicity in mice [23], [26], [44], [45], development in vectors [25], [46] and response to specific chemotherapy [24], [42], [47], [48] support a strong association between genetic distance and the biological and medical properties of the parasite. The above-mentioned studies have brought significant contributions, but none of them relied on a population genetic framework representative of the emergent Chagas disease areas, represented in Brazil by the Amazon region. Furthermore, to our knowledge, this is the first investigation focusing on biological and medical properties of TcIV strains from Amazon Region. Human acute Chagas disease caused by this DTU has been described [15] and recently, our group reported that the majority of the acute cases in the Western Brazilian Amazon, including outbreaks by oral transmission, were triggered by TcIV [17].

In this work TcIV showed clearly higher virulence in comparison with TcI strains, as demonstrated by the higher values of parasitemia parameters and shortest PPP. TcI strains promoted predominantly subpatent and intermittent parasitemias, in agree with the results obtained from previous experimental studies using TcI from the Amazon region [49]. Furthermore, TcIV parasites were more infective for mice and promoted higher mortality in the acute phase, while TcI led to higher mortality in the chronic phase. However, taking into account the mortality parameter, we suggest that both DTUs had low virulence, since a previous report demonstrated that T. cruzi stocks (both TcI and TcII) isolated from patients in the acute phase killed 100% of the animals [50].

Previous reports have shown a great competence of TcII strains to invade human and monkey cells [51], [52], to infect and render patent parasitemias in mice [53] and to infect and multiplicate inside macrophages [54] in comparison to TcI strains. However, it has to be mentioned that some discrepant results were reported as well. Revollo et al. [24], for instance, showed that TcI parasites displayed a higher infection rate to Vero cell monolayers than TcII stocks. Some works demonstrated that TcI strains have a greater ability to complete its life cycle in the vector [25], [46], and a higher capacity for intracellular multiplication in the vertebrate host populations, leading to higher parasitemias in comparison to TcII [26], [45], [55], [56]. In a study conducted with TcI and TcIV isolates from United States, the two T. cruzi DTUs caused differential infection dynamics in mice and rats as determined by PCR detection of T. cruzi DNA in the blood and tissues [57]. These authors found that sylvatic TcI isolates from the United States had greater infectivity to laboratory rodents than TcIV isolates, contradicting our results with isolates from Brazilian Amazon. Despite being indistinguishable by traditional genotyping and generally being assigned to Z3, there are evidences that TcIV from South America and TcIV from North America correspond to independent lineages using cytochrome b and SSU rDNA sequences, which circulate in distinct hosts and ecological niches [58].

The histopathological results revealed in general the presence of few amastigotes nests and mild inflammatory lesions. TcI triggered inflammatory process in skeletal muscle, heart and brain, while TcIV promoted mild inflammatory process uniquely in skeletal muscle. Parasitism was observed only in 4 mice examined, all infected by two TcI strains (AM49 and AM61), that presented well-limited pseudocysts surrounded by mild inflammatory reaction. Moreover, severe inflammatory process occurred only in skeletal muscle of mice infected by TcI. Histopathological alterations were not observed in large intestine, liver and, spleen of infected mice. Thus, although the lower values of parasitemia, TcI determined relatively most severe inflammatory process and higher frequency of tissue parasitism in mice than TcIV.

Although TcIV stocks have been demonstrated higher virulence than TcI, its pathogenicity was also incipient. These data taken together emphasize that the biological and medical properties of the stocks from this area are crucial to be considered in researches about the clinical end epidemiological picture of Chagas disease in the Amazon context. These profiles agree with the hypothesis of authors who suggested that the framework of chronic latent infection and a relative low performance of diagnostic tests in the State of Amazonas are due to the lower parasitemia, virulence, and pathogenicity of the wild parasites in this area [29]. However, pathogenicity triggered by TcIV should be interpreted with caution, since there were documented cases of chronic Chagas heart disease caused by TcI/TcIV mixed infections in Colombia [59], and two cases of chronic disease with cardiac/digestive involvement associated with Z3 parasite that clustered with CANIII (prototype of the TcIV DTU) at the isoenzymic analysis in Ecuador [60]. In the Western Brazilian Amazon, TcIV has been associated with two outbreaks of acute Chagas disease probably linked to oral transmission [17].

Resistance to benznidazole was significantly higher for TcIV strains. In vitro [24], [61] and in vivo [42], [47], [48] studies found that clones belonging to the lineage TcI are more resistant to benznidazole and nifurtimox than that belonging to the lineage TcII. Actually, as observed in central Brazil, patients infected with TcI strains showed higher resistance to chemotherapy with benznidazole compared with those infected with TcII [62]. Murta et al. [63] reported higher efficiency of chemotherapy with benznidazole and nifurtimox in human disease in areas with high prevalence of hybrid zymodemes. However, preliminary data about the response to specific chemotherapy in patients from outbreaks related to oral transmission in areas of predominance of TcI in the Amazon Region have been shown high parasitological cure rates and decrease of the antibody titres [30], [64], reinforcing that TcI isolates from Brazilian Amazon poses a dissimilar behavior when compared to other areas.

The seminal biological studies have demonstrated the huge heterogeneity of T. cruzi parasites, but were probably hampered by the fact that recent and unexpanded isolates from wild environment were not frequently used. Our work includes non- or low-passaged parasite natural stocks and contributes to diminish this biased sampling. A limitation of this approach may be the instability of the composition of these stocks, but we believe that our methodology better simulates what happens in nature, where populations are often identified in multiclonality in vertebrate hosts and triatomines [5]. Results strongly support the working hypothesis that biological differences are proportional to the evolutionary divergence among the DTUs. This shows that evolutionary divergence and biological differences do not evolve independently, and can be statistically predicted from each other to a large extent. We highlight the need to take into account the phylogenetic diversity of T. cruzi natural stocks circulating in the emergent areas for Chagas disease in all applied studies dealing with clinical diversity of Chagas disease, immunology, diagnosis, prognosis, and drug and vaccine trials. The potential of the two lineages in terms of severity and clinical manifestations remains to be determined in humans, namely for TcIV strains.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Methods of the study.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002069.s001

(PPTX)

Table S1.

Characteristics of Trypanosoma cruzi stocks from the State of Amazonas, Brazil.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002069.s002

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the personnel involved in the isolation and molecular characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi strains collected from humans, triatomines and mammal reservoirs and to Richard Thomson and Brian McCarthy for the English revision of the final version of the manuscript. We thank the reviewers for considerably contributing for the improvement of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WMM MTB HS MJdOT MdGVB. Performed the experiments: WMM APMT APG DdR MTB LKCM HS. Analyzed the data: WMM MTB HS MJdOT MdGVB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MLG SMdA MTB HS MJdOT MdGVB. Wrote the paper: WMM APG JAdOG HS MJdOT MdGVB.

References

  1. 1. Hotez PJ, Bottazzi ME, Franco-Paredes C, Ault SK, Roses-Periago M (2008) The neglected tropical diseases of Latin America and the Caribbean: estimated disease burden and distribution and a roadmap for control and elimination. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2: e300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000300
  2. 2. Coura JR (2007) Chagas disease: what is known and what is needed – A background article. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 102: 113–122. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762007000900018
  3. 3. Teixeira ARL, Monteiro OS, Rebelo JM, Argañaraz ER, Vieira D, et al. (2001) Emerging Chagas disease: trophic network and cycle of transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi from palm trees in the Amazon. Emerg Infec Dis 7: 100–112. doi: 10.3201/eid0701.070100
  4. 4. Coura JR, Junqueira ACV (2012) Risks of endemicity, morbidity and perspectives regarding the control of Chagas disease in the Amazon Region. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 107: 145–154. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762012000200001
  5. 5. Zingales B, Miles MA, Campbell DA, Tibayrenc M, Macedo AM, et al. (2012) The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: Rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infect Genet Evol 12: 240–253. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.12.009
  6. 6. Brisse S, Barnabé C, Tibayrenc M (2000) Identification of six Trypanosoma cruzi phylogenetic lineages by random amplified polymorphic DNA and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Int J Parasitol 30: 35–44. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(99)00168-x
  7. 7. Zingales B, Andrade SG, Briones MRS, Campbell DA, Chiari E, et al. (2009) A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 104: 1051–1054. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000700021
  8. 8. Luquetti AO, Miles MA, Rassi A, Rezende JM, Souza AA, et al. (1986) Trypanosoma cruzi: zymodemes associated with acute and chronic Chagas' disease in central Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 80: 462–70. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(86)90347-0
  9. 9. Añez N, Crisante G, Maia-da-Silva F, Rojas A, Carrasco H, et al. (2004) Predominance of lineage I among Trypanosoma cruzi isolates from Venezuelan patients with different clinical profiles of acute Chagas' disease. Trop Med Int Health 9: 1319–1326. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01333.x
  10. 10. Flórez O, Higuera S, Barraza MF, Cabrera HB, Mantilla JC, et al. (2010) Chagasic megacolon associated with Trypanosoma cruzi I in a Colombian patient. Parasitol Res 107: 439–442. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1874-2
  11. 11. Miles MA, Cedillos RA, Póvoa MM, Souza AA, Prata A, et al. (1981) Do radically dissimilar Trypanosoma strains (zimodemes) cause Venezuelan and cardiac forms of Chagas' disease? Lancet 1: 1338–1340. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92518-6
  12. 12. Ruiz-Sánchez R, León MP, Matta V, Reyes PA, López R, et al. (2005) Trypanosoma cruzi isolates from Mexican and Guatemalan acute and chronic chagasic cardiopathy patients belong to Trypanosoma cruzi I. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 100: 281–283. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762005000300012
  13. 13. Ramos-Ligonio A, Torres-Montero J, López-Monteon A, Dumonteil E (2012) Extensive diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units circulating in Triatoma dimidiata from central Veracruz, Mexico. Infect Genet Evol 12: 1341–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.04.024
  14. 14. Tibayrenc M, Ayala FJ (1988) Isozyme variability in Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas disease: genetical, taxonomical, and epidemiological significance. Evolution 42: 277–292. doi: 10.2307/2409232
  15. 15. Marcili A, Valente VC, Valente SA, Junqueira ACV, Maia-da-Silva F, et al. (2009) Trypanosoma cruzi in Brazilian Amazonia: Lineages TCI and TCIIa in wild primates, Rhodnius spp. and in humans with Chagas disease associated with oral transmission. Int J Parasitol 39: 615–623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.09.015
  16. 16. Abolis NG, Araújo SM, Toledo MJO, Fernandez MA, Gomes ML (2011) Trypanosoma cruzi I, II, III in southern Brazil causing individual and mixed infections in humans, sylvatic reservoirs and triatomines. Acta Trop 120: 167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.08.001
  17. 17. Monteiro WM, Magalhães LKC, de Sá ARN, Gomes ML, Toledo MJO, et al. (2012) Trypanosoma cruzi IV causing outbreaks of acute Chagas disease and infections by different haplotypes in the Western Brazilian Amazonia. PloS ONE 7: e41284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041284
  18. 18. Carrasco HJ, Segovia M, Llewellyn MS, Morocoima A, Urdaneta-Morales S, et al. (2012) Geographical Distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi Genotypes in Venezuela. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001707
  19. 19. Machado CA, Ayala FJ (2001) Nucleotide sequences provide evidence of genetic exchange among distantly related lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 7396–7401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121187198
  20. 20. Gaunt MW, Yeo M, Frame IA, Stothard JR, Carrasco HJ, et al. (2003) Mechanism of genetic exchange in American trypanosomes. Nature 421: 936–939. doi: 10.1038/nature01438
  21. 21. Ocaña-Mayorga S, Llewellyn MS, Costales JA, Miles MA, Grijalva MJ (2010) Sex, Subdivision, and Domestic Dispersal of Trypanosoma cruzi Lineage I in Southern Ecuador. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000915
  22. 22. Ramírez JD, Guhl F, Messenger LA, Lewis MD, Montilla M, et al. (2012) Contemporary cryptic sexuality in Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Ecol 21: 4216–4226. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05699.x
  23. 23. Laurent JP, Barnabé C, Quesney V, Noel S, Tibayrenc M (1997) Impact of clonal evolution on the biological diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi. Exp Parasitol 114: 213–218. doi: 10.1017/s0031182096008414
  24. 24. Revollo S, Oury B, Laurent J, Barnabé C, Quesney V, et al. (1998) Trypanosoma cruzi: impact of clonal evolution of the parasite on its biological and medical properties. Exp Parasitol 89: 30–39. doi: 10.1006/expr.1998.4216
  25. 25. Lana M, Pinto AS, Barnabé C, Quesney V, Noel S, et al. (1998) Trypanosoma cruzi: compared vectorial transmissibility of three major clonal genotypes by Triatoma infestans. Exp Parasitol 89: 1–5. doi: 10.1006/expr.1998.4304
  26. 26. Toledo MJO, Lana M, Carneiro CM, Bahia MT, Machado-Coelho GL, et al. (2002) Impact of Trypanosoma cruzi clonal evolution on its biological properties in mice. Exp Parasitol 100: 61–172. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4894(02)00003-6
  27. 27. de Diego JA, Palau MT, Gamallo C, Penin P (1998) Relationships between histopathological findings and phylogenetic divergence in Trypanosoma cruzi. Trop Med Int Health 3: 222–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.1998.tb00275.x
  28. 28. Coura JR, Junqueira ACV, Fernandes O, Valente SAS, Miles MA (2002) Emerging Chagas disease in Amazonian Brazil. Trends Parasitol 18: 171–176. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(01)02200-0
  29. 29. Brum-Soares LM, Xavier SS, Sousa AS, Borges-Pereira J, Ferreira JMBB, et al. (2010) Morbidity of Chagas disease among autochthonous patients from the Rio Negro microregion, State of Amazonas. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 43: 170–177. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822010000200013
  30. 30. Valente SAS, Valente VC, Pinto AYN, César MJB, Santos MP, et al. (2009) Analysis of an acute Chagas disease outbreak in the Brazilian Amazon: human cases, triatomines, reservoir mammals and parasites. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 103: 291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.10.047
  31. 31. Macedo AM, Machado C, Oliveira R, Pena S (2004) Trypanosoma cruzi: genetic structure of populations and relevance of genetic variability to the pathogenesis of Chagas disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 99: 1–12. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762004000100001
  32. 32. Fernandes O, Santos SS, Cupolillo E, Mendonça B, Derre R, et al. (2001) A mini-exon multiplex polymerase chain reaction to distinguish the major groups of Trypanosoma cruzi and T. rangeli in the Brazilian Amazon. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 95: 97–99. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(01)90350-5
  33. 33. Souto RP, Fernandes O, Macedo AM, Campbell DA, Zingales B (1996) DNA markers define two major phylogenetic lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 83: 141–152. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(96)02755-7
  34. 34. Freitas JM, Augusto-Pinto L, Pimenta JR, Bastos-Rodrigues L, Gonçalves VF, et al. (2006) Ancestral genomes, sex and the population structure of Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS Pathog 2: e24. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020024
  35. 35. Brener Z (1962) Therapeutic activity and criterion of cure on mice experimentally infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 4: 389–396.
  36. 36. Reis D, Monteiro WM, Bossoloni GDP, Teston AP, Araújo SM, et al. (2012) Biological behavior in mice of Trypanosoma cruzi isolates from Amazonas and Paraná states, Brazil. Exp Parasitol 130: 321–329. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.02.016
  37. 37. Filardi L, Brener Z (1987) Susceptibility and natural resistance of Trypanosoma cruzi strains to drugs used clinically in Chagas' disease. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 81: 755–759. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(87)90020-4
  38. 38. Wincker P, Britto C, Pereira JB, Cardoso MA, Oelemann W, et al. (1994) Use of a simplified polymerase chain reaction procedure to detect Trypanosoma cruzi in blood samples patients in a rural endemic area. Am J Trop Med Hyg 71: 771–777.
  39. 39. Gomes ML, Macedo AM, Vago AR, Pena SD, Galvão LM, et al. (1998) Trypanosoma cruzi: optimization of polymerase chain reaction for detection in human blood. Exp Parasitol 88: 28–33. doi: 10.1006/expr.1998.4191
  40. 40. Miyamoto CT, Gomes ML, Marangon AV, Araújo SM, Bahia MT, et al. (2006) Trypanosoma cruzi: Sensitivity of the polymerase chain reaction for detecting the parasite in the blood of mice infected with different clonal genotypes. Exp Parasitol 112: 198–201. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2005.10.006
  41. 41. Voller A, Bidwell D, Bartlet A (1980) Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. In: Rose NR, Friedman R, editors. Manual of Clinical Immunology. New York: Cornell University Press. pp. 359–371.
  42. 42. Toledo MJ, Bahia MT, Carneiro CM, Martins-Filho OA, Tibayrenc M, et al. (2003) Chemotherapy with benznidazole and itraconazole for mice infected with different Trypanosoma cruzi clonal genotypes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47: 223–230. doi: 10.1128/aac.47.1.223-230.2003
  43. 43. Dvorak JA, Hartman DL, Miles MA (1980) Trypanosoma cruzi: correlation of growth kinetics to zymodeme type in clones derived from various sources. J Protozool 27: 472–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1980.tb05401.x
  44. 44. Andrade SG (1985) Morphological and behavioural characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi strains. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 18: 39–46.
  45. 45. Andrade SG, Magalhães JB (1997) Biodemes and zymodemes of Trypanosoma cruzi strains: correlations with clinical data and experimental pathology. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 30: 27–35. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86821997000100006
  46. 46. García ES, Azambuja P (1991) Development and interaction of Trypanosoma cruzi within the insect vector. Parasitol Today 7: 240–244. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(91)90237-i
  47. 47. Andrade SG, Magalhães JB, Pontes AL (1985) Evaluation of chemotherapy with benznidazole and nifurtimox in mice infected with Trypanosoma cruzi strains of different types. Bull Wld Health Org 63: 721–726.
  48. 48. Toledo MJ, Bahia MT, Veloso VM, Carneiro CM, Machado-Coelho GL, et al. (2004) Effects of specific treatment on parasitological and histopathological parameters in mice infected with different Trypanosoma cruzi clonal genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 1045–1053. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh224
  49. 49. Lisboa CV, Pinho AP, Monteiro RV, Jansen AM (2007) Trypanosoma cruzi (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae): biological heterogeneity in the isolates derived from wild hosts. Exp Parasitol 116: 150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.12.005
  50. 50. Oliveira EC, Stefani MMA, Campos DE, Andrade ALSS, Silva SA, et al. (1997) Trypanosoma cruzi stocks isolated from acute Chagas disease patients lead to lethal murine infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 91: 25–27. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(97)90381-3
  51. 51. Neira I, Ferreira A, Yoshida N (2002) Activation of distinct signal transduction pathways in Trypanosoma cruzi isolates with differential capacity to invade host cells. Int J Parasitol 32: 405–414. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00004-8
  52. 52. Ruiz R, Favoreto Jr S, Dorta M, Oshiro M, Ferreira A, et al. (1998) Infectivity of Trypanosoma cruzi strains is associated with differential expression of surface glycoproteins with differential Ca++ signalling activity. Biochem J 330: 505–511.
  53. 53. Yoshida N (1983) Surface antigens of metacyclic trypomastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. Infect Immun 40: 836–839.
  54. 54. Pena DA, Eger I, Nogueira L, Heck N, Menin Á, et al. (2011) Selection of TcII Trypanosoma cruzi population following macrophage infection. J Infect Dis 204: 478–486. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir292
  55. 55. González J, Muñoz S, Ortiz S, Anacona D, Salgado S, et al. (1995) Biochemical, immunological and biological characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi populations of the Andean North of Chile. Exp Parasitol 81: 125–135. doi: 10.1006/expr.1995.1100
  56. 56. Sánchez G, Wallace A, Olivares M, Díaz N, Aguilera X, et al. (1990) Biological characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi zymodemes: in vitro differentiation of epimastigotes and infectivity of culture metacyclic trypomastigotes to mice. Exp Parasitol 71: 125–133. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(90)90015-5
  57. 57. Roellig DM, Yabsley MJ (2010) Infectivity, pathogenicity, and virulence of Trypanosoma cruzi isolates from sylvatic animals and vectors, and domestic dogs from the United States in ICR Strain Mice and SD Strain Rats. Am J Trop Med Hyg 83: 519–522. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0663
  58. 58. Marcili A, Lima L, Valente V, Valente S, Batista J, et al. (2009) Comparative phylogeography of Trypanosoma cruzi TCIIc: new hosts, association with terrestrial ecotopes, and spatial clustering. Infect Genet Evol 9: 1265–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.07.003
  59. 59. Ramírez JD, Guhl F, Rendón LM, Rosas F, Marin-Neto JA, et al. (2010) Chagas Cardiomyopathy Manifestations and Trypanosoma cruzi Genotypes Circulating in Chronic Chagasic Patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000899
  60. 60. Garzón EA, Barnabé C, Córdova X, Bowen C, Paredes W, et al. (2002) Trypanosoma cruzi isoenzyme variability in Ecuador: first observation of zymodeme III genotypes in chronic chagasic patients. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96: 378–382. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90367-6
  61. 61. Barnabé C, Tibayrenc M, Dujardin JP (1983) Trypanosoma cruzi. A pharmacological comparison of some Bolivian isoenzymic strains. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop 63: 319–324.
  62. 62. Andrade SG, Rassi A, Magalhães JB, Ferriolli-Filho F, Luquetti AO (1992) Specific chemotherapy of Chagas disease: a comparison between the response in patients and experimental animals inoculated with the same strains. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 86: 624–626. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90156-7
  63. 63. Murta SMF, Gazzinelli RT, Brener Z, Romanha AJ (1998) Molecular characterization of susceptible and naturally resistant strains of Trypanosoma cruzi to benznidazole and nifurtimox. Mol Biochem Parasitol 93: 203–214. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(98)00037-1
  64. 64. Pinto AYN, Ferreira AG, Valente VC, Harada GS, Valente SAS (2009) Urban outbreak of acute Chagas disease in Amazon region of Brazil: four-year follow-up after treatment with benznidazole. Rev Panam Salud Publica 25: 77–83. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892009000100012