Advertisement
Research Article

Gene Expression Profiling and Molecular Characterization of Antimony Resistance in Leishmania amazonensis

  • Rubens L. do Monte-Neto,

    Affiliations: Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie du Centre de Recherche du CHUL and Département de Microbiologie, Immunologie et Infectiologie, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada

    X
  • Adriano C. Coelho,

    Affiliation: Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie du Centre de Recherche du CHUL and Département de Microbiologie, Immunologie et Infectiologie, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada

    X
  • Frédéric Raymond,

    Affiliations: Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie du Centre de Recherche du CHUL and Département de Microbiologie, Immunologie et Infectiologie, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada, Département de Médecine Moléculaire Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada

    X
  • Danielle Légaré,

    Affiliation: Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie du Centre de Recherche du CHUL and Département de Microbiologie, Immunologie et Infectiologie, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada

    X
  • Jacques Corbeil,

    Affiliations: Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie du Centre de Recherche du CHUL and Département de Microbiologie, Immunologie et Infectiologie, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada, Département de Médecine Moléculaire Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada

    X
  • Maria N. Melo,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Frédéric Frézard,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Marc Ouellette mail

    Marc.Ouellette@crchul.ulaval.ca

    Affiliation: Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie du Centre de Recherche du CHUL and Département de Microbiologie, Immunologie et Infectiologie, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada

    X
  • Published: May 24, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167

Abstract

Background

Drug resistance is a major problem in leishmaniasis chemotherapy. RNA expression profiling using DNA microarrays is a suitable approach to study simultaneous events leading to a drug-resistance phenotype. Genomic analysis has been performed primarily with Old World Leishmania species and here we investigate molecular alterations in antimony resistance in the New World species L. amazonensis.

Methods/Principal Findings

We selected populations of L. amazonensis promastigotes for resistance to antimony by step-wise drug pressure. Gene expression of highly resistant mutants was studied using DNA microarrays. RNA expression profiling of antimony-resistant L. amazonensis revealed the overexpression of genes involved in drug resistance including the ABC transporter MRPA and several genes related to thiol metabolism. The MRPA overexpression was validated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and further analysis revealed that this increased expression was correlated to gene amplification as part of extrachromosomal linear amplicons in some mutants and as part of supernumerary chromosomes in other mutants. The expression of several other genes encoding hypothetical proteins but also nucleobase and glucose transporter encoding genes were found to be modulated.

Conclusions/Significance

Mechanisms classically found in Old World antimony resistant Leishmania were also highlighted in New World antimony-resistant L. amazonensis. These studies were useful to the identification of resistance molecular markers.

Author Summary

Leishmania are unicellular microorganisms that can be transmitted to humans by the bite of sandflies. They cause a spectrum of diseases called leishmaniasis, which are classified as neglected tropical diseases by the World Health Organization. The treatment of leishmaniasis is based on the administration of antimony-containing drugs. These drugs have been used since 1947 and still constitute the mainstay for leishmaniasis treatment in several countries. One of the problems with these compounds is the emergence of resistance. Our work seeks to understand how these parasites become resistant to the drug. We studied antimony-resistant Leishmania amazonensis mutants. We analyzed gene expression at the whole genome level in antimony-resistant parasites and identified mechanisms used by Leishmania for resistance. This work could help us in developing new strategies for treatment in endemic countries where people are unresponsive to antimony-based chemotherapy. The identification of common mechanisms among different species of resistant parasites may also contribute to the development of diagnostic kits to identify and monitor the spread of resistance.

Introduction

Leishmaniasis refers to a spectrum of parasitic diseases caused by protozoan parasites belonging to the genus Leishmania. The diseases are classified as neglected tropical diseases according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and constitute a public health problem in many developing countries of East Africa, the Indian subcontinent and Latin America. Human leishmaniasis has a prevalence of 12 million cases, with an estimated population of 350 million at risk and an incidence of 2 million new cases annually. Depending on Leishmania species, the host immune response, and environmental factors, leishmaniasis exhibits a broad spectrum of clinical manisfestations [1]. For example, in the New World, Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis, Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis and Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis are the causative agents of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis while Leishmania (L.) infantum chagasi is the aetiological agent of American visceral leishmaniasis [1], [2].

Pentavalent antimonials (SbV), such as sodium stibogluconate (Pentostam®) and meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime®) have been the first-line drugs in the treatment of all forms of leishmaniasis in South America, North Africa, Turkey, Bangladesh and Nepal. One major drawback of the SbV treatment is the emergence of resistance. For example, more than 60% of patients with visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar State in India are unresponsive to treatment with SbV antimonials [3]. The emergence of antimony resistance is related to inappropriate drug exposure resulting in a build-up of subtherapeutic blood levels and increasing tolerance of parasites to SbV [4]. Other drugs have been introduced as alternative chemotherapeutic agents including pentamidine, paromomycin, liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine. However, either side effects, lower effectiveness or high cost have limited their use [5].

The mechanisms involved in antimony resistance in Leishmania are partially understood. Antimonial drugs are administered as SbV, a prodrug that is reduced to SbIII, the trivalent and biologically active Sb form [6], [7]. However, the site of this reduction (macrophages and/or parasites) remains unclear. Two genes that encode proteins involved in Sb reduction have been described recently, the arsenate reductase LmACR2 and TDR1 thiol-dependent reductase [8], [9]. Nevertheless, the role of these reductases in antimony resistance is not clear. Non enzymatic Sb reduction is also possible and probably mediated by the reducing agents glutathione (GSH) and trypanothione (T(SH)2) [5], [10], [11]. Once reduced in the macrophages, SbIII uptake is mediated by the aquaglyceroporin1 (AQP1) [12] and downregulation of AQP1 gene expression is correlated to resistance [13].

Increases of T(SH)2 levels have been observed in parasites selected for resistance to SbIII or arsenite [14]. This enhancement is usually related to the increased levels of rate-limiting enzymes involved in the synthesis of GSH (gamma glutamylcysteine synthetase- γ-GCS) and polyamines (ornithine decarboxylase – ODC) [15], [16]. The use of specific inhibitors of γ-GCS or ODC can revert the resistance phenotype in mutants [16]. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) protein MRPA has been classically related with drug resistance in Leishmania and plays a major role in metal resistance in these parasites [17]. MRPA is a member of the multidrug-resistance protein (MRP) family and its localization in intracellular vesicle membranes strongly suggests that it sequesters Sb-thiol complexes into these vesicles [18]. The MRPA gene has been found frequently amplified in laboratory-selected antimony- or arsenite-resistant Leishmania mutants as well as in field isolates [19], [20], [21].

Improved knowledge of the mechanisms involved in drug resistance using laboratory-selected mutants or field isolates are mostly derived from Old World Leishmania species such as L. tarentolae [22], L. major [23], [24], L. tropica [25], L. donovani [26], and L. infantum [27]. On the other hand, the mechanism of drug resistance in New World Leishmania species remains poorly explored. Nevertheless, phenotypic and molecular characterizations of drug resistance have been recently published for human pathogenic neotropical Leishmania species [28], [29], [30]. Resistance to antimony in L. amazonensis has not been well studied as yet. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for drug resistance in Leishmania could support the design of new strategies for the successful treatment of leishmaniasis as well as the identification of molecular markers for resistance.

Considering the multiplicity of mechanisms leading to antimony resistance, the simultaneous analysis of gene expression could provide useful information about the antimony-resistance mechanisms in Leishmania and help the identification of new pathways involved in resistance. Recent studies have demonstrated the usefulness of whole-genome DNA microarrays for studying drug resistance in Leishmania [31], [32]. In this study, populations of L. amazonensis resistant to SbIII were selected in vitro in order to study global gene expression modulation associated with antimony resistance.

Methods

Parasite culture conditions and selection of SbIII resistant parasites

Leishmania amazonensis (MHOM/BR/1989/Ba199) promastigotes were maintained in minimum essential culture medium (α-MEM) (Gibco, Invitrogen, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Multicell, Wisent Inc. Québec, CA), 100 µg/ml kanamycin, 50 µg/ml ampicillin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 5 µg/ml hemin, 5 µM biopterin, (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA), pH 7.0 and incubated at 25°C in B.O.D incubators (Johns Scientific-VWR, Toronto, CA). The parasites were kindly provided by Dr. Aldina Barral, Gonçalo Muniz Research Center, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brazil [33]. Populations of Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes were selected for SbIII resistance as previously described [19]. The four independent mutants of L. amazonensis Ba199SbIII2700.1 to Ba199SbIII2700.4 were individually selected in 25 cm2 flasks containing 5 ml of α-MEM medium in the presence of SbIII concentrations up to 2700 µM.

Stability and specificity of SbIII resistance in vitro

L. amazonensis Ba199Sb mutants selected for SbIII resistance were grown in the absence of antimony pressure for 20 passages to test for the resistance stability phenotype [34].

Leishmania full genome microarray design

The full genome arrays were described previously [31], [32], [35]. GeneDB version 3.0 of L. infantum genome and L. major genome version 5.2 were used for the probe selection. The microarray chip includes a total of 9173 Leishmania specific probes and control probes and made by Agilent Technologies (Mississauga, ON, CA). These arrays have been used successfully with several species [31], [35].

RNA extraction and cDNA labeling

Total RNA was extracted from 108 promastigotes during the mid-log growth phase using RNeasy Plus mini kit (Qiagen Sciences, Maryland, USA) as described by the manufacturer. The quality (based on the appearance of the spectra) and quantity of RNA were assessed using RNA 6000 Nano Assay chips on Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies Santa Clara, CA, USA). For each probe, 7 µg of RNA were converted to aminoallyl-dUTP incorporated cDNA using random hexamers (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in presence of Superscript III RNase H reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Aminoallyl-dUTP incorporated cDNA were thereafter coupled to Alexa Fluor 555 or Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer recommendations. Fluorescent cDNA were then purified using the probe purification kit ArrayIt (TeleChem International, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and quantified spectrophotometrically.

Microarray hybridization

The labeled and purified cDNA from L. amazonensis was mixed with 200 µg/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA); 200 µg/ml yeast tRNA (Sigma-Aldrich Ltd, ON, CA); 1 x blocking agent buffer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and 1 x hybridization buffer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), then mixed, denaturated 3 min at 95°C and incubated 30 min at 37°C. Mixed labeled cDNAs were applied in the hybridization chamber (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA USA) and the hybridization was performed for 24 h at 65°C into a hybridization oven (GeneChip®, Stovall Life Sciences, Greensboro, NC, USA). Slides were washed 5 min at room temperature in 0,5X SSC, 5% Triton-X102 with gentle agitation and subsequently washed 5 min in pre-warmed 0,1X SSC, 0,005% Triton-X102 at room temperature with occasional stirring.

Microarray data acquisition and analysis

Detection of Alexa Fluor 555 and Alexa Fluor 647 signals were performed on a G2565CA microarray scanner (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 5 µm resolution as previously described [32]. The signal intensity data were extracted from the primary scanned images using GenePix Pro 6.0 software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA). Five different cDNA preparations of each Ba199Sb mutant and their respective Ba199 wild-type were analyzed including dye-swaps. Normalization and statistical analyses were performed in R 2.2.1 software using the LIMMA (Linear Models for Microarray Data) 2.7.3 package [36], [37], [38]. Background correction was performed using the “edwards” method; within-array normalization was done by loess and between array normalization by the Aquantile method. Multiple testing corrections were done using the false discovery rate method with a threshold p value of 0.05. Only genes statistically significant with an absolute ratio greater than 1.5 were considered. Custom R programs were used for the generation of the chromosome expression maps. Data are available with the GEO accession number GSE26159.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Three independent RNA preparations were used for each real-time RTPCR experiment. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 2.5 µg of RNA using Oligo dT12–18 and SuperScript II RNase H-Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer protocol. Equal amounts of cDNA were run in triplicate and amplified in 20 µl reactions containing 1 x SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 100 nM forward and reverse primers and 1 µl cDNA target. Reactions were carried out using a rotator thermocycler Rotor Gene (RG 3000, Corbett Research, San Francisco, USA). Initially, mixtures were incubated at 95°C for 5 min and then cycled 30 times at 95, 60 and 72°C for 15 sec. No-template controls were used as recommended. Three technical and biological replicates were established for each reaction. The relative amount of PCR products generated from each primer set was determined based on the threshold cycle (Ct) value and the amplification efficiencies. Gene expression levels were normalized to constitutively expressed mRNA encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, LmjF30.2970). Primers for targeted genes MRPA (LmjF23.0250), NT3 (LmjF13.1210) and LmjF26.2680 were designed using Primer QuestSM (www.idtdna.com/Scitools/Applications/Pri​merquest). The sequences of the primers for MRPA are forward 5′-TGAGACACGCCGCATCAAGAGTAT-3′ and reverse 5′-TCAATGCTTCCTGCAGTACGAGGT-3′; for NT3 are forward 5′-AAGTTCATCTGGCCTCTCATGGCT-3′ and reverse 5′-GATGGTTGCAAACCACTTGTCCGT-3′; for LmjF26.2680 are forward 5′-ACCCAGTCATTCGTCATGCACTCT-3′ and reverse 5′- ATCTGGTTGACAGCGTCGCAAATG-3′ ; and for the GAPDH control forward 5′-GAAGTACACGGTGGAGGCTG-3′ and reverse 5′-CGCTGATCACGACCTTCTTC-3′.

DNA manipulations

Genomic DNA was isolated from L. amazonensis Ba199 WT and Ba199 antimony-resistant mutants using DNazol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Southern-blots and pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) conditions were done following standard protocols [20]. Genomic DNAs were digested with PvuI and electrophoresed in 1% agarose gel. The fragments were transferred to HybondTM-N+ membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and submitted to Southern-blot analysis. Chromosomes of L. amazonensis Ba199 WT and antimony-resistant mutants were separated by PFGE in which low melting agarose blocks, containing embedded cells (108 log phase cells/ml) were electrophoresed in a contour clamped homogenous electric field apparatus (CHEF Mapper, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in 0,5 x Tris-Borate-EDTA, with buffer circulation at a constant temperature of 14°C and run time of 30 h. Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes were used as size markers. DNA was transferred to nylon membranes, cross-linked to the membrane with UV light. The blots were hybridized with [α-32P]dCTP labeled DNA probes. The probes used in the present study included a 450 bp MRPA fragment and a α-tubulin probe used to control the DNA loading.

Measurement of intracellular thiols

Intracellular thiols were analyzed by derivatizing with mono-bromobimane and separating by high-performance liquid chromatography as described previously [14], [39] using a chromatograph Shimadzu SCL 10A. Thiols were identified from bimane fluorescence with excitation and emission at 360 and 450 nm, respectively using a coupled fluorescence detector (Shimadzu RF-10Axl).

Statistical analyses

The IC50 values were calculated by linear regression using the software GraphPad Prism 5.0 and Sigma Plot 10.0 for windows. Differences in the level of intracellular thiols were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test post-test using GraphPad Prism 5.0. The level of significance acceptable was 95% (p<0.05).

Results

Characterization of resistance phenotype in laboratory-selected antimony resistant mutants

Four independent mutants of L. amazonensis were selected step by step for antimony (SbIII) resistance. The IC50 value of the sensitive Ba199 strain was 83 µM, whereas the antimony resistant-mutants Ba199SbIII2700.1, 2700.2, 2700.3 and 2700.4 had IC50 values greater than 2700 µM (Table 1), the highest achievable soluble SbIII concentration in α-MEM medium at pH 7. The stability of the resistance phenotype was tested by growing the cells in the absence of SbIII. After 20 passages without drug pressure, only the resistance in mutant Ba199SbIII2700.2 was found to be stable, while the other three mutants showed decreased resistance levels (Table 1). However, reversion was only partial since the Ba199SbIII2700.1, 2700.3 and 2700.4 mutants were not as sensitive as wild-type cells to SbIII (Table 1). The susceptibility to miltefosine in the SbIII-resistant L. amazonensis mutants was also tested. None were cross-resistant but 3 out of the 4 lines were surprisingly hypersensitive to it (Table 1). Intriguingly, we have also observed hypersensitivity to miltefosine in L. infantum SbIII-resistant mutants (W. Moreira and M. Ouellette, unpublished observations).

thumbnail

Table 1. Inhibitory concentration of L. amazonensis strain Ba199 antimony-sensitive and –resistant independent mutants.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.t001

RNA expression profiling in Leishmania amazonensis antimony-resistant mutants

The Ba199SbIII2700.2 and Ba199SbIII2700.3 lines were selected for gene expression studies using full genome DNA microarrays. We plotted the log2-transformed gene expression ratios of Ba199SbIII2700.2 (red line) and Ba199SbIII2700.3 (blue line) compared to Ba199WT parental strain, as a function of the microarray probes (Fig. 1). Most genes were equally expressed but about 10% of genes showed a statistical significant variation (summarized in Table S1 and detailed in Tables S2 and S3) with approximately 2-fold differential expression but some reached log2-transformed ratio values up to 4 and −4 (Fig. 1). The differential hybridization data were also represented on a chromosome by chromosome basis (Figs. 2 and 3). Upregulated and downregulated genes are indicated by red and green lines, respectively, while equally expressed genes were shown as gray regions. Some obvious changes in gene expression were noticed. A specific region at one telomeric end of chromosome 23 was upregulated in Ba199SbIII2700.2 (Fig. 2), while most genes of chromosome 23 seemed upregulated in Ba199SbIII2700.3 (Fig. 3). Chromosome aneuploidy has been described previously in Old World drug resistant Leishmania [31], [32] and the chromosome maps of Figs. 2 and 3 suggest that this phenomenon also takes place in New World Leishmania species with chromosomes 1, 10, 16, 27 and 31 becoming polyploids in Ba199SbIII2700.2 (Fig. 2) while in addition to chromosome 23, chromosomes 5, 27 and 32 are polyploids and chromosome 4 is haploid in Ba199SbIII2700.3 (Fig. 3). A region of chromosome 35, 250 kb from one telomeric end, corresponds to loci where the expression of genes was down regulated in both Ba199SbIII2700.2 and Ba199SbIII2700.3 mutants (Figs. 2 and 3). The expression of genes part of a region on chromosome 33, 1.5 Mb from one telomere end was also down regulated in both mutants (Figs. 2 and 3).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Differential gene expression in L. amazonensis antimony resistant mutants.

Overlap of log2-transformed L. amazonensis Ba199 SbIII2700.2/WT and SbIII2700.3/WT expression ratio plotted as a function of the chromosomal location of probes represented on the full-genome microarrays from chromosome 1 (left end) to chromosome 36 (right end). Vertical lines represent the log2-transformed expression ratio of individual genes. Upregulated genes are represented by positive values whereas negative values indicate downregulated genes at the RNA level. The plot represents the average values of five independent hybridizations for each mutant.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.g001
thumbnail

Figure 2. Gene expression map of L. amazonensis Ba199 SbIII2700.2/WT.

DNA microarrays data were analyzed by custom R programs to illustrate the expression profile of Ba199SbIII2700.2/WT by extrapolating on a chromosome map of L. major. Red lines indicate upregulated genes in Ba199 SbIII2700.2, whereas green lines indicate downregulated genes. Gray features indicate genes equally expressed in both samples while white regions have not hybridized to probes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.g002
thumbnail

Figure 3. Gene expression map of L. amazonensis Ba199 SbIII2700.3/WT.

DNA microarrays data were analyzed by custom R programs to illustrate the expression profile of Ba199SbIII2700.3/WT by extrapolating on a chromosome map of L. major. Red lines indicate upregulated genes in Ba199 SbIII2700.3, whereas green lines indicate downregulated genes. Gray features indicate genes equally expressed in both samples while white regions have not hybridized to probes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.g003

The array results led to several candidate genes putatively correlated to resistance. Candidate genes could either be highly differentially regulated or part of large regions differentially regulated, as highlighted in Figs. 2 and 3. The genes common to both mutants most differentially down regulated included the hypothetical protein gene LmjF26.2680 and a putative lmgt2 glucose transporter gene LmjF36.6290 (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). On the other hand, the gene common to both mutants most upregulated was corresponding to the nucleobase transporter NT3 LmjF13.1210. The overexpression of NT3 was confirmed by qRT-RTPCR which yielded similar results as found with microarrays with higher expression of NT3 in Ba199SbIII2700.2 compared to 2700.3 (Fig. 1, Fig. 4). We also tested the two other L. amazonensis mutants available and found that NT3 was also overexpressed in Ba199SbIII2700.1 and 2700.4 (Fig. 4). Similarly, we confirmed the down regulation of LmjF26.2680 by qRT-RTPCR not only in Ba199SbIII2700.2 and 2700.3 but also in two other L. amazonensis resistant mutants (Fig. 4). None of the genes described above were previously linked to antimony resistance in Leishmania. For specific larger regions that were presumed to be up or down regulated as determined from the chromosome maps of Figs. 2 and 3, we found that the region of chromosome 23 upregulated in Ba199SbIII2700.2 (Fig. 2) contained several genes (Table S2) including the ABC protein gene MRPA LmjF23.0250, a well established marker of antimony resistance [40], [41]. The MRPA gene was also upregulated in Ba199SbIII2700.3 (Fig. 3) as determined by microarrays (Table S3). As discussed above, two regions of chromosome 35 and 33 appeared to be down regulated in both mutants. The region of chromosome 35 encodes for several hypothetical proteins, but also three proteophosphoglycan (PPG) genes PPG1, PPG3 and PPG5 (Tables S2 and S3). Similarly, the region of chromosome 33 corresponds mostly to hypothetical proteins (Tables S2 and S3). With the exception of MRPA, none of the genes highlighted in this study were previously linked to antimony resistance. We searched for genes that were previously linked to resistance with significant changes in gene expression and found several genes that were upregulated in the Ba199SbIII mutants and that were involved in redox and thiol metabolism such as peroxidoxin (LmjF23.0040), glutaredoxin (LmjF05.0310), trypanothione synthetase (LmjF23.0460; LmjF27.1870), trypanothione reductase (LmjF05.0350), and spermidine synthase (LmjF04.0580) (Tables S2 and S3). The overexpression of several trypanothione biosynthetic genes (e.g. spermidine synthase, trypanothione synthetase) prompted us to quantify the level of intracellular reduced thiols, since resistance to SbIII is often correlated to increased glutathione and trypanothione levels in Old World Leishmania [42]. The antimony-resistant L. amazonensis mutants, with the exception of Ba199SbIII2700.1 (for glutathione), had significant higher levels of cysteine, glutathione and trypanothione (Fig. 5).

thumbnail

Figure 4. RNA expression in L. amazonensis antimony resistant mutants by quantitative real time RT-PCR.

The RNA expression ratios of the nucleobase transporter gene NT3, the ABC protein MRPA gene and the hypothetical protein encoding gene LmjF26.2680 were measured in L. amazonensis antimony resistant mutants, which were compared to levels found in WT cells. The expression of GAPDH was used to normalize the data. The values are the mean of two independent experiments each performed with three biological RNA preparations.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.g004
thumbnail

Figure 5. Intracellular levels of thiols in L. amazonensis antimony resistant mutants.

Thiols were derivatized with monobromobimane and separated by HPLC coupled with a fluorescent detector. Values are representative of two experiments performed in triplicate. Asterisks indicate statistically significant changes compared with Ba199 WT. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test. *** = p<0.01.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.g005

We also tested the role of genes previously not associated with resistance, concentrating on some of the genes most differentially expressed. These genes correspond to the hypothetical gene LmjF26.2680 which was down regulated by more than 20-fold in all mutants (Fig. 4) and NT3 that was overexpressed in all mutants as determined by real-time RT-PCR (Fig. 4). Transfection of LmjF26.2680 in wild-type L amazonensis or in its resistant mutants did not change their susceptibilities to SbIII (results not shown). Similarly, transformation and overexpression of NT3, did not lead to higher resistance to SbIII in wild type cells (result not shown).

Increased MRPA expression mediated by gene amplification in antimony-resistant L. amazonensis mutants

The MRPA gene was overexpressed in both mutants (Table S2 and S3) and this upregulation was indeed confirmed by qRT-RTPCR in Ba199SbIII2700.2 and 2700.3 but MRPA was also found overexpressed in Ba199SbIII2700.1 and 2700.4 (Fig. 4). The fold increased expression by qRT-RTPCR was higher than what microarray would have suggested. Often, but not always, gene overexpression is correlated to gene amplification in Leishmania [13], [40], [41]. Southern blot analysis and careful densitometric quantification has indeed indicated that MRPA gene copy number is increased in the mutants compared to wild-type cells (Fig. 6A). Increased gene copy number is usually due to the formation of extrachromosomal circular or linear elements [43], [44] although changes in copy number of whole chromosomes have also been reported [31], [32]. Search for extrachromosomal circles failed by standard alkaline lysis extractions and we thus relied on CHEF gels to separate the Leishmania chromosomes and investigated for the presence of short linear amplicons. Hybridization to a MRPA probe showed the presence of linear amplicons in Ba199SbIII2700.1 and 2700.2 while the whole chromosome 23 was increased in copy number in Ba199SbIII2700.3 and 2700.4 (Fig. 6B). These results are consistent with the microarray data (Figs. 2 and 3).

thumbnail

Figure 6. Amplification of MRPA gene in antimony-resistant L. amazonensis.

(A) Total genomic DNAs of Leishmania cells were digested with PvuI, electrophoresed on agarose gel, transferred onto a membrane and hybridized with an MRPA specific probe. Southern blot hybridization was quantified using ImageJ 1.43 (NIH) and the fold differences in DNA copy number of Ba199Sb mutants compared to WT are listed. (B) Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to separate the chromosomes of L. amazonensis. The CHEF blot was hybridized with the same MRPA probe. The Southern-blot membranes were washed and rehybridized with an α-tubulin probe to monitor the amount of DNA layered on the gel. Marker (M); L. amazonensis Ba199WT (lane 1); Ba199SbIII2700.1 (lane 2); Ba199SbIII2700.2 (lane 3); Ba199SbIII2700.3 (lane 4); Ba199SbIII2700.4 (lane 5).

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.g006

Discussion

Resistance to antimony in Leishmania has been studied mostly in Old World species and mostly in strains in which resistance was induced under laboratory conditions (reviewed in [5], [42]). However, with a better understanding of in vitro resistance mechanisms, more work has recently been done with clinical isolates and some of the markers highlighted in in vitro studies were shown to correlate with drug resistance in clinical isolates [20], [45]. In general, there is a reasonable agreement between in vitro susceptibility testing and clinical response with Old World Leishmania when assays are carried out with intracellular parasites [45], [46], [47]. However, there are conflicting results in linking in vitro susceptibility testing and clinical responses with New World leishmaniasis [48], [49]. There have been few studies on mechanisms of resistance to antimony in New World parasites and we have thus used here the proven approach of in vitro selected resistant cells. Four independent L. amazonensis clones were selected for resistance to SbIII. Resistance was in general unstable when cells were grown in absence of the drug (Table 1), a result also recently observed with New World Leishmania selected for antimony resistance [28].

To find possible markers of resistance in these L. amazonensis strains, we carried out RNA expression profiling on full genomic DNA microarrays, a technique proven useful to study resistance mechanisms in Leishmania [31], [32], [50]. We found several gene candidates (Table S2 and S3), some for which the expression was highly modulated in comparison to sensitive isolates. Two of these genes (the hypothetical LmjF26.2680 and NT3) were new and were experimentally tested by gene transfection. However, we could not directly link them to resistance. NT3 and LmjF26.2680 were respectively overexpressed and down-regulated in four independent mutants (Fig. 4), and this recurrence would argue for some role in resistance. If it is not directly involved in resistance as the transfection work would suggest, it could either require another product to confer resistance or it may have another more indirect role such as in increased fitness or compensating for other mutations. We noticed that one glucose transporter in Ba199SbIII2700.3 was down regulated (Fig. 1). Decrease glucose uptake, for example by minimizing reactive oxygen species, was suggested as a general mechanism associated with drug resistance in L. amazonensis [51]. Future work will be required to test this. It is also worthnoting that while the expression of NT3 is increased, this is not due to gene amplification. Indeed, the NT3 copy number remains similar to wild-type (result not shown). While changes in expression in resistant isolates are often due to changes in gene copy number, there has been several other reports of increased expression by other means which will likely involve post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms. Indeed, the expression of genes in Leishmania is not controlled at the level of transcription initiation [52], [53].

The microarray work allowed detecting alterations of expression of large regions of genomic DNA and even of whole chromosomes (Figs. 2 and 3). In Leishmania these alterations are usually linked to changes in copy number [31], [32]. One region that attracted our attention was part of chromosome 23. Mutant Ba199SbIII2700.2 had a specific region that was overexpressed while the whole chromosome 23 seemed overexpressed in Ba199SbIII2700.3. The gene MRPA, one marker highly correlated to SbIII resistance in Old World Leishmania, is encoded by chromosome 23. We tested whether this increased expression was due to changes in copy number and Southern blot analysis indeed confirmed that MRPA is amplified (Fig.6A). New World Leishmania is divided in two subgenus: Leishmania and Viannia. Gene amplification is rare in the Viannia subgenus [30] and this may be due to an active RNA interference (RNAi) mechanism in this subgenus but absent in the Leishmania subgenus [54]. It is thus surprising that there is one report of a circular extrachromosomal amplification of MRPA in L. V. guyanensis selected for antimony resistance [55]. There is, however, ample report of gene amplification in the New World Leishmania subgenus whether it is L. amazonensis [56], [57] or L. mexicana [58]. No MRPA amplification has been observed in one L. amazonensis strain selected for SbIII resistance [59] but a circular amplification was observed in L. mexicana selected for resistance to the related metal arsenite [58]. The MRPA containing amplicon in L. mexicana or L. V. guyanensis corresponded to an extrachromosomal circle. In Ba199SbIII2700.2 the amplification was a linear amplicon and extended from the telomeric region to gene LmjF23.0540 (a region of ~230 kb). All linear amplifications so far described, indeed extended to the telomeric region and are usually forming large inverted duplications [31]. This duplication of the region amplified fits with the size of this linear amplicon (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, we also found an MRPA containing linear amplicon in Ba199SbIII2700.1 (Fig. 6B). The amplicon is smaller, suggesting that a different rearrangement point, usually at the level of inverted repeats [31], [60] has been used. The microarray data indicate that the whole chromosome 23 was increased in Ba199SbIII2700.3 and this was corroborated by Southern blot analysis (Fig. 6). Indeed, the CHEF showed clearly that chromosome 23 had a higher hybridization intensity compared to Ba199SbII2700.2 (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, polyploidy of chromosome 23 was also observed in Ba199SbII2700.4. Intriguingly, this relatively modest increase in copy number was nonetheless correlated to a high MRPA expression at the RNA level (Fig. 4). Thus an increase in MRPA expression in L. amazonensis is correlated to either the formation of extrachromosomal linear amplicons or the increased ploidy of the chromosome.

This study has shown that mechanisms of resistance to antimony found in Old World Leishmania can also be detected in New World species. This includes higher thiol levels (Fig. 5) and increased expression of the ABC MRPA, whose gene product sequesters thiol-metal conjugates into an intracellular organelle [18]. Overexpression of several genes was found to correlate with increased thiols [15], [16], [50] and overexpression of spermidine synthase (leading to polyamines, one constituent of trypanothione) and trypanothione synthase (supplementary Tables S2 and S3) could contribute to the observed increased thiols. Also we noticed that trypanothione reductase was overexpressed and this would maintain thiols into a reduced form and this gene was found overexpressed in field isolates [61]. Many other genes were found to be differentially regulated although analysis of two candidates did not allow finding a role in resistance. Nonetheless with all microarray experiments done with several different species it should now be possible to perform meta-analysis which could direct at further candidates for a better understanding of antimony resistance mechanisms in the protozoan parasite Leishmania.

The study presented here should serve as a useful basis for analyzing antimony resistance in clinical isolates of new world leishmaniasis. Indeed, in vitro work mostly with the promastigote stage of old world leishmaniasis has led to a number of drug resistant markers [5], [42]. These markers were shown to confer resistance in the amastigote or intracellular stage of the parasite [40] and even more importantly in L. donovani field isolates [20], [61], [62], [63]. Since several markers were highlighted here with in vitro resistance in L. amazonensis, it would now be possible to test whether similar resistance mechanisms take place with drug resistant clinical isolates of New World leishmaniasis.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Overview of differential gene expression profile in laboratory-selected antimony-resistant mutants Leishmania amazonensis Ba199SbIII2700.2 and Ba199SbIII2700.3

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.s001

(DOC)

Table S2.

Genes significantly modulated in antimony-resistant Leishmania amazonensis Ba199SbIII2700.2. The data were obtained by full genome microarray hybridization of Ba199SbIII2700.2 against Ba199 WT.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.s002

(DOC)

Table S3.

Genes significantly modulated in antimony-resistant Leishmania amazonensis Ba199SbIII2700.3. The data were obtained by full genome microarray hybridization of Ba199SbIII2700.3 against Ba199 WT.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001167.s003

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Eric Madore (Plateforme Génomique, Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, QC, CA) for the generous help with microarray experiments and Gaétan Roy for help with the HPLC.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RLdM-N DL JC MNM FF MO. Performed the experiments: RLdM-N ACC FR. Analyzed the data: RLdM-N FR DL JC MNM FR MO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FR JC. Wrote the paper: RLdM-N DL FF MO.

References

  1. 1. Murray HW, Berman JD, Davies CR, Saravia NG (2005) Advances in leishmaniasis. Lancet 366: 1561–1577.
  2. 2. Marzochi MC, Marzochi KB (1994) Tegumentary and visceral leishmaniases in Brazil: emerging anthropozoonosis and possibilities for their control. Cad Saude Publica 10: Suppl 2359–375.
  3. 3. Sundar S (2001) Drug resistance in Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Trop Med Int Health 6: 849–854.
  4. 4. Sundar S, Thakur BB, Tandon AK, Agrawal NR, Mishra CP, et al. (1994) Clinicoepidemiological study of drug resistance in Indian kala-azar. Bmj 308: 307.
  5. 5. Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH (2006) Drug resistance in leishmaniasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 19: 111–126.
  6. 6. Frezard F, Demicheli C, Ferreira CS, Costa MA (2001) Glutathione-induced conversion of pentavalent antimony to trivalent antimony in meglumine antimoniate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45: 913–916.
  7. 7. Shaked-Mishan P, Ulrich N, Ephros M, Zilberstein D (2001) Novel Intracellular SbV reducing activity correlates with antimony susceptibility in Leishmania donovani. J Biol Chem 276: 3971–3976.
  8. 8. Zhou Y, Messier N, Ouellette M, Rosen BP, Mukhopadhyay R (2004) Leishmania major LmACR2 is a pentavalent antimony reductase that confers sensitivity to the drug pentostam. J Biol Chem 279: 37445–37451.
  9. 9. Denton H, McGregor JC, Coombs GH (2004) Reduction of anti-leishmanial pentavalent antimonial drugs by a parasite-specific thiol-dependent reductase, TDR1. Biochem J 381: 405–412.
  10. 10. Yan S, Li F, Ding K, Sun H (2003) Reduction of pentavalent antimony by trypanothione and formation of a binary and ternary complex of antimony(III) and trypanothione. J Biol Inorg Chem 8: 689–697.
  11. 11. Ferreira Cdos S, Martins PS, Demicheli C, Brochu C, Ouellette M, et al. (2003) Thiol-induced reduction of antimony(V) into antimony(III): a comparative study with trypanothione, cysteinyl-glycine, cysteine and glutathione. Biometals 16: 441–446.
  12. 12. Gourbal B, Sonuc N, Bhattacharjee H, Legare D, Sundar S, et al. (2004) Drug uptake and modulation of drug resistance in Leishmania by an aquaglyceroporin. J Biol Chem 279: 31010–31017.
  13. 13. Marquis N, Gourbal B, Rosen BP, Mukhopadhyay R, Ouellette M (2005) Modulation in aquaglyceroporin AQP1 gene transcript levels in drug-resistant Leishmania. Mol Microbiol 57: 1690–1699.
  14. 14. Mukhopadhyay R, Dey S, Xu N, Gage D, Lightbody J, et al. (1996) Trypanothione overproduction and resistance to antimonials and arsenicals in Leishmania. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 10383–10387.
  15. 15. Grondin K, Haimeur A, Mukhopadhyay R, Rosen BP, Ouellette M (1997) Co-amplification of the gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase gene gsh1 and of the ABC transporter gene pgpA in arsenite-resistant Leishmania tarentolae. Embo J 16: 3057–3065.
  16. 16. Haimeur A, Guimond C, Pilote S, Mukhopadhyay R, Rosen BP, et al. (1999) Elevated levels of polyamines and trypanothione resulting from overexpression of the ornithine decarboxylase gene in arsenite-resistant Leishmania. Mol Microbiol 34: 726–735.
  17. 17. Ouellette M, Legare D, Haimeur A, Grondin K, Roy G, et al. (1998) ABC transporters in Leishmania and their role in drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat 1: 43–48.
  18. 18. Legare D, Richard D, Mukhopadhyay R, Stierhof YD, Rosen BP, et al. (2001) The Leishmania ATP-binding cassette protein PGPA is an intracellular metal-thiol transporter ATPase. J Biol Chem 276: 26301–26307.
  19. 19. Ouellette M, Borst P (1991) Drug resistance and P-glycoprotein gene amplification in the protozoan parasite Leishmania. Res Microbiol 142: 737–746.
  20. 20. Mukherjee A, Padmanabhan PK, Singh S, Roy G, Girard I, et al. (2007) Role of ABC transporter MRPA, gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase and ornithine decarboxylase in natural antimony-resistant isolates of Leishmania donovani. J Antimicrob Chemother 59: 204–211.
  21. 21. Callahan HL, Beverley SM (1991) Heavy metal resistance: a new role for P-glycoproteins in Leishmania. J Biol Chem 266: 18427–18430.
  22. 22. Ouellette M, Fase-Fowler F, Borst P (1990) The amplified H circle of methotrexate-resistant leishmania tarentolae contains a novel P-glycoprotein gene. Embo J 9: 1027–1033.
  23. 23. Callahan HL, Roberts WL, Rainey PM, Beverley SM (1994) The PGPA gene of Leishmania major mediates antimony (SbIII) resistance by decreasing influx and not by increasing efflux. Mol Biochem Parasitol 68: 145–149.
  24. 24. Coelho AC, Beverley SM, Cotrim PC (2003) Functional genetic identification of PRP1, an ABC transporter superfamily member conferring pentamidine resistance in Leishmania major. Mol Biochem Parasitol 130: 83–90.
  25. 25. Gamarro F, Chiquero MJ, Amador MV, Legare D, Ouellette M, et al. (1994) P-glycoprotein overexpression in methotrexate-resistant Leishmania tropica. Biochem Pharmacol 47: 1939–1947.
  26. 26. Carter KC, Hutchison S, Henriquez FL, Legare D, Ouellette M, et al. (2006) Resistance of Leishmania donovani to sodium stibogluconate is related to the expression of host and parasite gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 88–95.
  27. 27. Sereno D, Guilvard E, Maquaire S, Cavaleyra M, Holzmuller P, et al. (2001) Experimental studies on the evolution of antimony-resistant phenotype during the in vitro life cycle of Leishmania infantum: implications for the spread of chemoresistance in endemic areas. Acta Trop 80: 195–205.
  28. 28. Liarte DB, Murta SM (2010) Selection and phenotype characterization of potassium antimony tartrate-resistant populations of four New World Leishmania species. Parasitol Res 107: 205–212.
  29. 29. Zauli-Nascimento RC, Miguel DC, Yokoyama-Yasunaka JK, Pereira LI, Pelli de Oliveira MA, et al. (2010) In vitro sensitivity of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis and Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis Brazilian isolates to meglumine antimoniate and amphotericin B. Trop Med Int Health 15: 68–76.
  30. 30. Dias FC, Ruiz JC, Lopes WC, Squina FM, Renzi A, et al. (2007) Organization of H locus conserved repeats in Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis correlates with lack of gene amplification and drug resistance. Parasitol Res 101: 667–676.
  31. 31. Ubeda JM, Legare D, Raymond F, Ouameur AA, Boisvert S, et al. (2008) Modulation of gene expression in drug resistant Leishmania is associated with gene amplification, gene deletion and chromosome aneuploidy. Genome Biol 9: R115.
  32. 32. Leprohon P, Legare D, Raymond F, Madore E, Hardiman G, et al. (2009) Gene expression modulation is associated with gene amplification, supernumerary chromosomes and chromosome loss in antimony-resistant Leishmania infantum. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 1387–1399.
  33. 33. de Oliveira JP, Fernandes F, Cruz AK, Trombela V, Monteiro E, et al. (2007) Genetic diversity of Leishmania amazonensis strains isolated in northeastern Brazil as revealed by DNA sequencing, PCR-based analyses and molecular karyotyping. Kinetoplastid Biol Dis 6: 5.
  34. 34. Dey S, Papadopoulou B, Haimeur A, Roy G, Grondin K, et al. (1994) High level arsenite resistance in Leishmania tarentolae is mediated by an active extrusion system. Mol Biochem Parasitol 67: 49–57.
  35. 35. Rochette A, Raymond F, Ubeda JM, Smith M, Messier N, et al. (2008) Genome-wide gene expression profiling analysis of Leishmania major and Leishmania infantum developmental stages reveals substantial differences between the two species. BMC Genomics 9: 255.
  36. 36. Smyth GK, Speed T (2003) Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods 31: 265–273.
  37. 37. Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott HS (2005) Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 21: 2067–2075.
  38. 38. Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3: Article3.
  39. 39. Fairlamb AH, Henderson GB, Bacchi CJ, Cerami A (1987) In vivo effects of difluoromethylornithine on trypanothione and polyamine levels in bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Biochem Parasitol 24: 185–191.
  40. 40. El Fadili K, Messier N, Leprohon P, Roy G, Guimond C, et al. (2005) Role of the ABC transporter MRPA (PGPA) in antimony resistance in Leishmania infantum axenic and intracellular amastigotes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 1988–1993.
  41. 41. Leprohon P, Legare D, Girard I, Papadopoulou B, Ouellette M (2006) Modulation of Leishmania ABC protein gene expression through life stages and among drug-resistant parasites. Eukaryot Cell 5: 1713–1725.
  42. 42. Ouellette M, Drummelsmith J, Papadopoulou B (2004) Leishmaniasis: drugs in the clinic, resistance and new developments. Drug Resist Updat 7: 257–266.
  43. 43. Beverley SM (1991) Gene amplification in Leishmania. Annu Rev Microbiol 45: 417–444.
  44. 44. Ouellette M, Hettema E, Wust D, Fase-Fowler F, Borst P (1991) Direct and inverted DNA repeats associated with P-glycoprotein gene amplification in drug resistant Leishmania. Embo J 10: 1009–1016.
  45. 45. Decuypere S, Rijal S, Yardley V, De Doncker S, Laurent T, et al. (2005) Gene expression analysis of the mechanism of natural Sb(V) resistance in Leishmania donovani isolates from Nepal. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 4616–4621.
  46. 46. Lira R, Sundar S, Makharia A, Kenney R, Gam A, et al. (1999) Evidence that the high incidence of treatment failures in Indian kala-azar is due to the emergence of antimony-resistant strains of Leishmania donovani. J Infect Dis 180: 564–567.
  47. 47. Hadighi R, Mohebali M, Boucher P, Hajjaran H, Khamesipour A, et al. (2006) Unresponsiveness to Glucantime treatment in Iranian cutaneous leishmaniasis due to drug-resistant Leishmania tropica parasites. PLoS Med 3: e162.
  48. 48. Rojas R, Valderrama L, Valderrama M, Varona MX, Ouellette M, et al. (2006) Resistance to antimony and treatment failure in human Leishmania (Viannia) infection. J Infect Dis 193: 1375–1383.
  49. 49. Yardley V, Ortuno N, Llanos-Cuentas A, Chappuis F, Doncker SD, et al. (2006) American tegumentary leishmaniasis: Is antimonial treatment outcome related to parasite drug susceptibility? J Infect Dis 194: 1168–1175.
  50. 50. Guimond C, Trudel N, Brochu C, Marquis N, El Fadili A, et al. (2003) Modulation of gene expression in Leishmania drug resistant mutants as determined by targeted DNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 5886–5896.
  51. 51. Machuca C, Rodriguez A, Herrera M, Silva S, Ponte-Sucre A (2006) Leishmania amazonensis: metabolic adaptations induced by resistance to an ABC transporter blocker. Exp Parasitol 114: 1–9.
  52. 52. Haile S, Papadopoulou B (2007) Developmental regulation of gene expression in trypanosomatid parasitic protozoa. Curr Opin Microbiol 10: 569–577.
  53. 53. Clayton C, Shapira M (2007) Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in trypanosomes and leishmanias. Mol Biochem Parasitol 156: 93–101.
  54. 54. Lye LF, Owens K, Shi H, Murta SM, Vieira AC, et al. (2010) Retention and loss of RNA interference pathways in trypanosomatid protozoans. PLoS Pathog 6: e1001161.
  55. 55. Anacleto C, Abdo MC, Ferreira AV, Murta SM, Romanha AJ, et al. (2003) Structural and functional analysis of an amplification containing a PGPA gene in a glucantime-resistant Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis cell line. Parasitol Res 90: 110–118.
  56. 56. Detke S, Katakura K, Chang KP (1989) DNA amplification in arsenite-resistant Leishmania. Exp Cell Res 180: 161–170.
  57. 57. Liu X, Chang KP (1992) The 63-kilobase circular amplicon of tunicamycin-resistant Leishmania amazonensis contains a functional N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate transferase gene that can be used as a dominant selectable marker in transfection. Mol Cell Biol 12: 4112–4122.
  58. 58. Legare D, Papadopoulou B, Roy G, Mukhopadhyay R, Haimeur A, et al. (1997) Efflux systems and increased trypanothione levels in arsenite-resistant Leishmania. Exp Parasitol 87: 275–282.
  59. 59. Moreira ES, Anacleto C, Petrillo-Peixoto ML (1998) Effect of glucantime on field and patient isolates of New World Leishmania: use of growth parameters of promastigotes to assess antimony susceptibility. Parasitol Res 84: 720–726.
  60. 60. Grondin K, Roy G, Ouellette M (1996) Formation of extrachromosomal circular amplicons with direct or inverted duplications in drug-resistant Leishmania tarentolae. Mol Cell Biol 16: 3587–3595.
  61. 61. Mittal MK, Rai S, Ashutosh , Ravinder , Gupta S, et al. (2007) Characterization of natural antimony resistance in Leishmania donovani isolates. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 681–688.
  62. 62. Mandal S, Maharjan M, Singh S, Chatterjee M, Madhubala R (2010) Assessing aquaglyceroporin gene status and expression profile in antimony-susceptible and -resistant clinical isolates of Leishmania donovani from India. J Antimicrob Chemother 65: 496–507.
  63. 63. Mandal G, Wyllie S, Singh N, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH, et al. (2007) Increased levels of thiols protect antimony unresponsive Leishmania donovani field isolates against reactive oxygen species generated by trivalent antimony. Parasitology 134: 1679–1687.