Research Article

An Encapsulated Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Is a Highly Efficient Vaccine against Pneumonic Plague

  • Anne Derbise,

    Affiliation: Unité de Recherche Yersinia, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

  • Alba Cerdà Marín,

    Affiliation: Unité de Recherche Yersinia, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

  • Patrick Ave,

    Affiliation: Unité Histotechnologie et Pathologie, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

    Current address: Unité d'Histopathologie Humaine et Modèles Animaux, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

  • Thierry Blisnick,

    Affiliation: Unité de Recherche Yersinia, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

    Current address: Unité de Biologie Cellulaire des Trypanosomes, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

  • Michel Huerre,

    Affiliation: Unité Histotechnologie et Pathologie, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

    Current address: Service de Pathologie, Institut Curie, Paris, France

  • Elisabeth Carniel,

    Affiliation: Unité de Recherche Yersinia, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

  • Christian E. Demeure mail

    Affiliation: Unité de Recherche Yersinia, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

  • Published: February 14, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001528



Plague is still a public health problem in the world and is re-emerging, but no efficient vaccine is available. We previously reported that oral inoculation of a live attenuated Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, the recent ancestor of Yersinia pestis, provided protection against bubonic plague. However, the strain poorly protected against pneumonic plague, the most deadly and contagious form of the disease, and was not genetically defined.

Methodology and Principal Findings

The sequenced Y. pseudotuberculosis IP32953 has been irreversibly attenuated by deletion of genes encoding three essential virulence factors. An encapsulated Y. pseudotuberculosis was generated by cloning the Y. pestis F1-encoding caf operon and expressing it in the attenuated strain. The new V674pF1 strain produced the F1 capsule in vitro and in vivo. Oral inoculation of V674pF1 allowed the colonization of the gut without lesions to Peyer's patches and the spleen. Vaccination induced both humoral and cellular components of immunity, at the systemic (IgG and Th1 cells) and the mucosal levels (IgA and Th17 cells). A single oral dose conferred 100% protection against a lethal pneumonic plague challenge (33×LD50 of the fully virulent Y. pestis CO92 strain) and 94% against a high challenge dose (3,300×LD50). Both F1 and other Yersinia antigens were recognized and V674pF1 efficiently protected against a F1-negative Y. pestis.

Conclusions and Significance

The encapsulated Y. pseudotuberculosis V674pF1 is an efficient live oral vaccine against pneumonic plague, and could be developed for mass vaccination in tropical endemic areas to control pneumonic plague transmission and mortality.

Author Summary

Plague, among the most deadly infections of mankind's history, is present in Africa, Asia and America, and is currently re-emerging, recently causing cases in areas from where it had disappeared for decades. Pneumonic plague, its most deadly and contagious form, is responsible for human-to-human spreading of the infection. Vaccination would be an effective means to control the disease, but no efficient vaccine is currently available. Because live vaccines are potent inducers of protective immunity, our strategy was to use a Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, closely related to Y. pestis but genetically more stable, to make it suitable for use as live oral vaccine. We have developed a genetically defined Y. pseudotuberculosis strain strongly attenuated by deletion of virulence factors genes, which was also induced to produce the Y. pestis F1 pseudocapsule. A single oral dose was harmless and provided high- level protection against pneumonic plague. Such a candidate vaccine offers promising perspectives to control pneumonic plague mortality and transmission.


Plague, the dreadful infectious disease that caused three major pandemics in history, is still a public health problem. Since the 1980s, an increase of cases worldwide has been observed, leading to categorize plague as a re-emerging disease. Whereas the most active foci of human plague are located in east-central Africa and Madagascar [1], recent cases have also been recorded in areas from where it had disappeared for decades, like Algeria, Libya, Zambia and Jordan [2], [3], [4]. Moreover, because plague is principally a zoonotic disease affecting rodents, the territories where it is endemic in its animal reservoir are much more extended than the observed human plague foci.

Plague is an acute, often fatal infection whose etiologic agent, Yersinia pestis, is a Gram-negative bacillus with an extreme pathogenicity. The accidental transmission of the plague bacillus from rodents to humans by the bite of infected fleas is the most frequent mode of human infection. From the skin, the bacteria migrate to the draining lymph nodes, causing the bubonic form of plague, which evolves toward septicemia and death within one week if treatment is not rapidly started. When the bacteria reach the lungs, an acute pneumonia develops. Patients become highly contagious through the emission of infected aerosols that cause primary pneumonic plague. The disease is then generally fatal within 3 days or less. Human-to-human transmission of pneumonic plague favors a rapid spread of the disease in heavily populated areas, as occurred for example recently in Madagascar and in the Democratic Republic of Congo [5], [6]. Although antibiotherapy is currently the main tool to fight the disease, the residual plague mortality in endemic countries remains around 10% or more. This is mainly due to the difficulty for patients from areas far from health structures to receive the treatment on time. An additional cause of concern is the recent identification in Madagascar of two Y. pestis strains naturally resistant to antibiotics, one of which was resistant to eight different antibiotics, including those recommended for plague treatment and prophylaxis [7]. Because this multi-drug resistant Y. pestis resulted from the acquisition of a widespread self-transmissible plasmid [8], the rise of such threatening Y. pestis variants may be anticipated. Finally, Y. pestis is also classified in the list A of pathogens with potential for bioterrorist use established by the US Center for Disease Control due to its pathogenicity and human-to-human transmission [9], and the possibility that the bacteria is engineered to resist to antibiotics for evil use cannot be excluded. In front of such a public health risk, mass vaccination might be one of the only alternatives to protect exposed populations. However, no safe and efficient vaccine against plague is currently available.

The first widely used plague vaccine was the live attenuated Y. pestis EV76 developed in Madagascar. This vaccine, that can have severe secondary effects, is now used in only few countries such as China or the former USSR. The licensed killed whole-cell Y. pestis vaccine from Greer/Miles was recently discontinued because it was reactogenic in humans and conferred only short-term protection [10], requiring annual booster immunizations. Much effort has been made in the recent years to develop new candidate vaccines. The strategies followed to induce protective immunity include the attenuation of live Y. pestis by genetic engineering, the introduction of Y. pestis antigens in Salmonella [11] and virus vectors [12], [13], as well as the production of subunit vaccines combining the capsular F1 antigen and the V antigen (LcrV) [14], [15], [16].

We recently reported that the attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis strain IP32680 can be used as a live oral vaccine against bubonic plague [17]. The rationale for choosing this approach was to combine the immunogenicity and antigenic complexity of live vaccines with the much lower virulence of Y. pseudotuberculosis. Indeed, Y. pestis is a clone recently emerged from Y. pseudotuberculosis [18], and the two species share more than 95% genetic identity. A reason not to use Y. pestis as live vaccine is its genetic instability, as revealed by the spontaneous genome reductions observed for the EV76 strain, which hampered its vaccine efficiency [19]. That risk is much lower for Y. pseudotuberculosis because such rearrangements in Y. pestis are thought to result from the high number of insertion sequences (IS) present in its genome [20], and Y. pseudotuberculosis has a much lower number of IS copies and so is genetically much more stable [20]. When given orally, Y. pseudotuberculosis IP32680 was able to colonize the gut without causing lesions and stimulated a protective immune response against bubonic plague [17]. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using a live attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis strain as an oral vaccine against plague. However, IP32680 is not suitable for human use because the genetic bases of its attenuation are not known and it does not confer high-level protection against pneumonic plague.

The aim of the present study was to construct a genetically engineered Y. pseudotuberculosis strain irreversibly attenuated in virulence, and able to confer high-level protection against pneumonic plague.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Animals were housed in the Institut Pasteur animal facilities accredited by the French Ministry of Agriculture to perform experiments on live mice (accreditation B 75 15-01, issued on may 22nd, 2008), in appliance of the French and European regulations on care and protection of the Laboratory Animals (EC Directive 86/609, French Law 2001-486 issued on June 6, 2001). Protocols were approved by the veterinary staff of the Institut Pasteur animal facility and were performed in compliance with the NIH Animal Welfare Insurance #A5476-01 issued on 02/07/2007.

Bacterial strains, plasmids and culture conditions

The Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. pestis isolates used in this study and their derivatives are listed in Table 1. Bacteria were grown at 28°C on Luria-Bertani agar plates supplemented with 0.2% hemin (LBH) for 48 h before use, and bacterial concentrations were evaluated by spectrometry at 600 nm and plating on LBH plates.


Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.



Deletion of the caf operon was performed in Y. pestis CO92p (Table 1) using the Short Flanking Homology (SFH) procedure [21] with primers 812 and 814 designed to exchange a portion of the caf locus encompassing the caf1M, caf1A and caf1 genes by a kanamycin resistance cassette (km from plasmid pGP704N-km). Deletion of the Y. pseudotuberculosis High Pathogenicity Island (HPI: YPTB1585 through YPTB1602), yopK (virulence plasmid gene PYV0040) and psaA (YPTB1334) sequences from IP32953p was done by allelic exchange with a kanamycin (km from plasmid pUC4K), spectinomycin (spec from plasmid pSW25) and trimethoprim (dfr from plasmid pGP704N-dfr) resistance cassette, respectively. HPI deletion was done following the Long Flanking Homology procedure [21]. yopK and psaA genes were first deleted individually in Y. pestis CO92p (Table 1) following the SFH procedure [21]. Second, the genomic DNA from the resulting deletants was used as template for PCR amplification of the antibiotic resistance cassettes flanked by the 500 bp upstream and downstream regions of yopK and psaA genes. The PCR products were electroporated into Y. pseudotuberculosis IP32953ΔHPI (Table 1), as described previously [21]. Recombinant colonies were selected for antibiotic resistance and were verified by PCR with primers located: (i) on each side of the inserted antibiotic cassette, and (ii) within each target region (Table S1). All the primer pairs used to generate PCR products for allelic exchange are listed in Table S1.

Cloning of the caf operon

To clone the caf operon into pGEN-lux [22], the entire locus was amplified with primer pair 837/838, which adds NotI and ApaI sites at the extremities. The PCR product was ligated to the corresponding sites in place of the lux operon. Then, the ligation mix was electroporated into E. coli TOP10 (Invitrogen). The pGEN-lux plasmid was chosen because it contains the hok/sok genes coding for a toxin/antitoxin module, and the parR/parM partition system, both stabilizing the plasmid in the bacterial population [23]. The presence of the plasmid with the appropriate insert (pGEN-caf) was checked after plasmid extraction and digestion. The pGEN-caf construct was introduced by electroporation into Y. pseudotuberculosis V674 and recombinant strains selected. The sequence of the cloned caf1 gene was verified by sequencing.

Analysis of F1 production

To determine the presence of a capsule, bacteria in India ink [24] were examined by phase-contrast microscopy. To quantify the production of the F1, ELISA plates (NUNC) were coated with the anti-F1 mAb G5-18 [25], followed by a 1% BSA blocking solution in PBS. Serial dilutions of bacterial suspensions (109 to 104 cfu/ml) in PBS containing 0.1% BSA were laid in the wells. The plate was centrifuged for 10 min (1000 g) prior to incubation for 1 h at room temperature. After 3 washes with PBS, biotinylated G5-18 anti-F1 mAb (1 µg/ml) was incubated for 1 h, followed by 30 min with Streptavidin coupled to horseradish peroxidase (Jackson Immunoresearch), and colorimetric revelation using TMB (OptiEIA, BD-biosciences), as previously described [17].

Animal infection and in vivo analyses

Mouse infections were performed in a BSL3 animal facility. Bacterial suspensions of bacteria (200 µl in saline) were given intragastrically to seven weeks old OF1 female mice (Charles River France) using a curved feeding needle. To determine the 50% lethal dose (LD50), mice (six per dose) were infected with 10 fold serial dilutions of bacterial suspensions and were monitored for 3 weeks. The method of Reed and Muench was used to calculate LD50 values [26].

In vivo dissemination was examined five or fifteen days after oral inoculation of bacteria. Peyer's patches, spleen and feces (two fecal pellets from the large intestine) were collected aseptically from euthanized mice and were homogenized in sterile PBS using 3 mm glass beads and an electric mill (TissueLyser®, Qiagen). The bacterial load was determined by plating serial dilutions of the homogenates.

The severity of lesions caused to tissues by Y. pseudotuberculosis strains was analyzed histologically. Animals were euthanized and target organs were fixed with 4% buffered formaldehyde for 48 h, embedded in paraffin, cut in 5 micrometers sections, and stained with hematoxylin–eosin. Histological sections were read blindly and lesions were quantified using a previously described scale [17] ranging from 0 to 10. For immunohistological detection of the F1 antigen produced in vivo, Peyer's patches collected 5 days after vaccination with the V674pF1 strain (1010 cfu) were fixed and embedded in low-melting point paraffin (polyEthylene Glycol distearate, Aldrich). Endogenous peroxidase activity was eliminated after deparaffinization by incubation in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min and non-specific binding sites was blocked for 30 min, prior to incubation (1 h) with the biotinylated anti-F1 G5-18 mAb. As a specificity control, an irrelevant and isotype-matched biotinylated mAb was used. After washes in PBS, sections were incubated for 1 h with Histofine® Simple Stain MAX PO (Rabbit specific; Nichirei corp.) and peroxidase activity was detected using 3-amino ethylcarbazole (AEC) substrate (Sigma). Tissues counterstained with Harris' hematoxylin were then observed using a Nikon Eclipse microscope.


Blood from live animals was collected by puncture of the maxillary artery with a Goldenrod lancet (Medipoint, USA). To perform intestinal lavages, the gut section extending from the stomach to the cecum was cut from euthanized mice and flushed with 10 ml cold PBS containing protease inhibitors (Complete® from Roche plus 10 mM PMSF from Sigma). After centrifugation (10 min at 10.000 rpm), supernatants were collected and all samples were frozen until use. Bronchoalveolar lavages were performed by injection of PBS containing protease inhibitors in the cannulated trachea. To quantify IgG and IgA specific for Yersinia antigens by ELISA, microtiter plates (NUNC) were coated with 5 µg/ml of a sonicate of Y. pseudotuberculosis IP32953 (hereafter referred to as Y. ptb Ag.) grown at 37°C on LB agar, as described before [17]. To quantify F1–specific IgG and IgA, plates were coated with F1 antigen (10 µg/ml), as described previously [25]. After blocking plates with 5% dry milk in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, bacteria grown at 37°C were serially diluted in PBS containing 0.1% BSA and were incubated in wells. Bound antibodies were detected using horseradish peroxidase (HRPO)–coupled rat antibodies specific for mouse IgG (Becton-Dickinson Pharmingen) or IgA (Caltag Laboratories), and HRPO activity was revealed using TMB substrate (OptiEIA, BD Pharmingen). Antibody titers were calculated as the reciprocal of the lowest sample dilution giving a signal equal to two times the background.

Cell-mediated response in vaccinated animals

Spleens taken aseptically from euthanized animals were cut in pieces and dissociated using cell strainers (BD Biosciences). Erythrocytes were lyzed using Gey's hemolytic solution [27] and splenocytes were extensively washed with cold PBS. Cells resuspended in RPMI 1640+Glutamax™ (Invitrogen) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin and 10 mM ß-mercaptoethanol were laid in 24 wells plates (5×106/well) and stimulated with either Y. ptb Ag. (5 µg/ml), the F1 antigen (5 µg/ml) or Concanavalin A (1 µg/ml; Sigma) as a positive control. After three days, the supernatant was collected and the cytokine content was determined using IFNγ and IL-17 assays (Duosets, R&D Systems).

Evaluation of mouse protection against a challenge with Y. pestis

The fully virulent Y. pestis strain CO92 or its non-encapsulated derivative CO92Δcaf1 (Table 1) were grown at 28°C and suspensions in saline containing 105 or 107 cfu (33×LD50 or 3,300×LD50, respectively) were prepared. Mice vaccinated or not 28 days before were anesthetized and were infected by instillation of 10 µl of Y. pestis suspensions in the nostrils. Animal survival was monitored for 21 days.

Statistical analyses

The Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare survival curves (protection). The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to compare lesions, weight, antibody titers and cytokines production.


Construction of an attenuated variant of Y. pseudotuberculosis IP32953

Strain IP32953 was chosen to generate an irreversibly attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis strain because its genome has been determined [20]. The HPI, encoding the Yersiniabactin iron capture system [28], was deleted by allelic exchange, generating IP32953ΔHPI (Table 1). The LD50 of IP32953ΔHPI (LD50 oral = 6.8×108) was 16 times higher than that of the parental IP32953 (4.2×107 cfu). Since more attenuation was required for a vaccine, the chromosomal psaA gene encoding the pH 6 Ag pilus [29]) and the virulence plasmid-borne yopK gene, encoding the type three secretion system effector protein YopK [30], were additionally deleted. The triple deletant (ΔHPI, ΔPsaA, ΔYopK) generated, named V674, exhibited a strong virulence attenuation (LD50>3×109 cfu), which was comparable to that of strain IP32680 [17]. Mice receiving 108 cfu of V674 presented no signs of disease and no weight loss (Fig. S1A), whereas the parental IP32953 induces severe signs of disease and weight loss before death [17]. Vaccination with a single oral dose (108 cfu) of V674 conferred protection to 69% of mice against an intranasal challenge with the fully virulent Y. pestis strain CO92 at a dose lethal for naive animals (105 cfu = 33×LD50). Although this level of protection was superior to that of IP32680 (30%; [17] it was considered insufficient, and V674 was further modified.

Construction of the V674pF1 strain producing an F1 capsule

In order to increase the ability of the candidate vaccine strain to induce a protective immunity against Y. pestis, V674 was further engineered to produce the Y. pestis F1 capsule. The caf operon from CO92, required for surface production of the F1 antigen in Y. pestis, was cloned into the pGEN plasmid. The resulting pGEN-caf plasmid was introduced into V674, generating V674pF1 (Table 1). The formation of a capsule around V674pF1 bacterial cells was observed (Fig. 1A c&d). When measured using an F1-specific ELISA, F1 production by V674pF1 was identical to that of Y. pestis CO92 (Fig. 1B). To determine whether the F1 capsule was produced in vivo, immunohistological staining of F1 was performed on sections of Peyer's patches taken from mice having received V674pF1 five days before. Small foci of F1-positive bacteria were detected using an anti-F1 monoclonal antibody (Fig. 1C), while no staining was detected when an irrelevant and isotype-matched biotinylated mAb was used as control (data not shown). The V674pF1 was thus able to produce the F1 capsule within mouse tissues. To determine whether the production of F1 had an impact on the virulence of the vaccine strain, graded doses of bacteria were inoculated orally to mice. Mice having received V674pF1 (108 or 109 cfu) presented no signs of disease and no weight loss (Fig. S1B) and no lethality was observed. A high dose of 2×1010 cfu also caused no lethality, revealing a very strong attenuation of virulence.


Figure 1. Strain V674pF1 produces an F1 capsule.

A: Strains (a) V674 as negative control, (b) CO92 as positive control, and (c–d) V674pF1 in India ink observed under phase-contrast microscopy. The capsule excludes the India ink and appears as a clear halo around bacterial cells. B: Comparison of F1 production by V674, V674pF1 and CO92 by ELISA. C: F1 production by V674pF1 in vivo: Peyer's patches were taken from animals infected orally 5 days before with 1010 cfu of V674pF1, and subjected to an immunohistological staining with an anti-F1 mouse mAb, followed by a hematoxylin counterstain. An example of a bacterial focus (brown-red color) is indicated by an arrow.


In vivo persistence and infectivity of recombinant strains

The ability of V674pF1 to persist in the intestinal tract after oral inoculation was examined by counting bacteria present in feces (Fig. 2). At the vaccine dose of 108 cfu, amounts of V674pF1 found at day 11 (d11) were comparable to those previously noted for the virulent IP32953 (#105 cfu; [17], and were also comparable to those found with the non-encapsulated V674, indicating that attenuation of virulence or F1 production did not affect the ability of V674pF1 to colonize the gut. Levels of V674pF1 were comparable when a higher vaccine dose (109 cfu) was used. The bacteria could be detected in feces for at least 20 days post infection, although at decreasing levels as compared to d11.


Figure 2. Gut colonization by Y. pseudotuberculosis mutants.

Bacteria present in the feces (2 pellets) from mice orally vaccinated with strains V674pF1 and V674 at the indicated doses (cfu) were counted eleven and twenty days after. Shown are individual values from 4 to 8 mice per condition. ns: not significant.


To evaluate the dissemination of V674pF1 toward internal organs, its presence in Peyer's patches and spleen was examined (Fig. 3A). In Peyer's patches, amounts of V674pF1, or V674 were similar on D5, indicating that the production of F1 did not modify its ability to infect this lymphoid tissue. Similar loads were observed with a higher V674pF1 dose (109 cfu). Ten days later (D15), lower levels of V674pF1 were observed, indicating a progressive lessening of infection, in agreement with counts seen in feces. Because animals infected by IP32953 died before D15, they could not be compared. In a deep organ such as the spleen, amounts of attenuated V674pF1 or V674 found 5 days after inoculation were significantly low as compared to IP32953, in agreement with their attenuation of virulence (Fig. 3A). Again, neither the presence of F1 nor the dose of V674pF1 used affected the splenic load. Ten days later, V674pF1 or V674 were most often not detectable, showing that the attenuated bacteria were rapidly cleared (Fig. 3A).


Figure 3. Dissemination and tissue lesions caused by Y. pseudotuberculosis mutants.

A: bacteria present in the Peyer's patches and the spleen (cfu/organ) of mice infected orally with strains IP32953 (108 cfu), V674 (108 cfu) or V674pF1 (108 and 109 cfu). Shown are results from individual mice. The median is indicated by a horizontal line. B: quantification of lesions in Peyer's patches and spleen of mice infected orally with strains IP32953 (108 cfu), V674 (108 cfu) or V674pF1 (109 cfu). The limit of detection was 10 cfu per organ. Organs taken at the indicated time were analyzed by histology after hematoxylin-eosin staining. Tissue lesion scores were recorded and shown are means ± s.e.m of four mice per condition. *: p≤0.05, ns: not significant, †: dead mice. C: Examples of lesions observed at Day 5 in the spleen and Peyer's patches from mice inoculated orally with IP32953 or V674pF1 (108 cfu). Arrowheads indicate abscesses, and an N indicate an area of necrosis. In IP32953-infected spleen, hemorrhage is widespread, whereas in V674pF1 infected spleen only subcapsular microhemorrhages (black arrows) and congestioned blood vessels (white arrows) are observed. L: insestinal lumen.


The potential development of lesions induced by the bacteria in these target organs was examined. As a reference, the wild type IP32953 at the 108 cfu lethal dose caused severe lesions to both the spleen and Peyer's patches (abscesses, necrosis), together with signs of erosion of the flanking intestinal mucosa (scores >6/10; Fig. 3 B&C). In contrast, the same dose of V674 strain caused mainly congestion and microhemorrhages in the spleen and liver, and infrequent abscesses (scores <2/10, Fig. 3 B) in all three tissues tested. When used at a high dose of 109 cfu to maximally reveal potential harmful effects, theV674pF1 strain also caused mild tissue lesions (scores ≤1/10; Fig. 3 B&C) that were not significantly different from those caused by V674, in spite of the dose difference. In agreement with bacterial clearance, histology of the spleen and Peyer's patches of mice vaccinated with either attenuated strain was normal or almost normal on Day 15 (score <1; Fig. 3 B), showing that tissues had healed. Altogether, our observations demonstrate that V674pF1 inoculated orally is able to colonize the gut and to interact with Peyer's patches, but fails to disseminate to high levels in the spleen, confirming its very high attenuation.

Humoral immune response elicited by vaccination

High levels of serum IgG directed against Y. pseudotuberculosis antigens were detected in sera from mice having received one oral dose of V674pF1 (108 cfu) 21 days before but not in sera from naive mice (Fig. 4A). Increasing the vaccine dose to 109 cfu did not significantly increase IgG. Comparison with mice vaccinated with the non-encapsulated V674 strain revealed comparable anti-Yersinia IgG levels (Fig. 4A). High levels of IgG directed against F1 were detected in sera from mice vaccinated with V674pF1, and not in sera from unvaccinated or V674-vaccinated mice.


Figure 4. Seric and mucosal humoral immune response of vaccinated mice.

To determine serum IgG titers against Y. pseudotuberculosis antigens (A) or against purified F1 antigen (B), blood was taken on day 21 from mice vaccinated orally with either V674 (108 cfu; 16 mice) or V674pF1 (32 mice received 108 cfu, 8 mice received 109 cfu), or from naive animals (8 mice). To determine anti-Y. pseudotuberculosis (C) or anti-F1 (D) IgA levels in serum, intestine and lungs, groups of 8 mice received 108 cfu or 109 cfu of strain V674pF1 orally, or were not vaccinated, and were sacrificed 3 weeks later to collect blood, intestinal lavage (5 ml) and bronchoalveolar lavage (2 ml). Each dot represents an individual animal and medians (-) are shown. *: p<0.05, **: p<0.005, ***: p<0.001, ns: not significant.


Because immunization through the oral route was expected to induce a mucosal type of immune response, IgA directed against both F1 and other Yersinia antigens were measured in mucosal tissues and blood after vaccination with V674pF1. Significant amounts of IgA were detectable in both intestinal lavages and sera but not in bronchoalveolar lavages (Fig. 4 C&D). Increasing the vaccine dose from 108 cfu to 109 cfu did not significantly affect the levels of IgA observed.

Cellular immune response to Yersinia antigens elicited by vaccination

The ability of V674pF1 to induce a cellular immune response was evaluated by comparing cytokine production by splenocytes taken from animals vaccinated with V674pF1 or V674 (both at 108 cfu) 21 days before, or not vaccinated. Splenocytes were stimulated with either a Y. pseudotuberculosis antigenic preparation obtained by sonication, or purified F1 antigen. The mitogen ConA was used as a positive control (Fig. 5 A&B).


Figure 5. Cellular immune response of vaccinated mice.

Splenocytes isolated from mice vaccinated orally 21 days before with strains V674pF1 (108 cfu) or V674 (108 cfu) or unvaccinated mice (naive) were stimulated in vitro with 5 µg/ml of either a Y. pseudotuberculosis antigenic preparation (Y. ptb Ag.) or purified F1 antigen. The mitogen Concanavalin A (ConA: 1 µg/ml) served as positive control. Supernatants taken 3 days after stimulation were tested by ELISA for the presence of IFNγ (A) and IL-17 (B). Shown are the mean ± s.e.m. of 16 mice per condition (2 pooled experiments). *: p<0.05, **: p<0.005, ***: p<0.001, ns: not significant.


Cells from mice vaccinated with either V674pF1 or V674 significantly produced IFNγ in response to Y. pseudotuberculosis antigens, whereas cells from control naive mice did not (Fig. 5A), revealing an antigen-specific memory response. Comparable levels of IFNγ for the V674pF1 and V674 groups indicated that the presence of F1 in V674pF1 did not affect the development of the cellular response against other Yersinia antigens. Cells from V674pF1–vaccinated mice also produced IFNγ in response to F1, whereas cells from naive or V674-vaccinated mice did not, indicating a F1-specific cellular response.

IL-17 production was also examined because IL-17-producing T lymphocytes (Th17 cells) are key players of antibacterial mucosal immunity [31], [32], [33], [34]. Splenocytes from V674pF1- and V674-vaccinated mice produced IL-17 upon stimulation with Y. pseudotuberculosis antigens (Fig. 5B), whereas cells from naive mice did not, indicating the recruitment of Y. pseudotuberculosis–specific IL-17 producing cells. Because splenocytes from only half of the mice vaccinated with V674pF1 produced IL-17 upon stimulation by F1, the mean production was not statistically significant. Notably, Y. pseudotuberculosis antigens induced a stronger production of IFNγ and IL-17 than F1 (×15 and ×6 respectively), indicating that the multiple antigens included are important targets of cell-mediated immunity.

Protection against pneumonic plague

The ability of V674pF1 to confer protective immunity was evaluated by challenging immunized mice intranasally with a lethal dose of the fully virulent Y. pestis CO92 (105 cfu = 33×LD50). While all unvaccinated animals died within 3–4 days (Fig. 6A), a single oral inoculation of V674pF1 (108 cfu) resulted in complete (100%) protection. In contrast, vaccination with V674 conferred protection to 69% of animals only. When a very high challenge dose of 107 cfu CO92 (3,300×LD50) was used to mimic a severe contamination, mice vaccinated with 108 cfu of V674pF1 showed 80% protection and this protection reached 94% when a vaccine dose of 109 cfu was administered (Fig. 6B).


Figure 6. Protection of vaccinated mice against pneumonic plague.

Mice having received a single oral vaccination with strains V674pF1 or V674 at the indicated doses were challenged 4 weeks later by intranasal instillation of the indicated dose of Y. pestis CO92 (A, B) or CO92Δcaf (C). Mouse survival was recorded daily for 21 days. Results from repeated experiments with 7–8 animals per group were pooled and the total number of mice per condition is indicated inside the corresponding bar. *: p≤0.05, **: p≤0.005, ***: p<0.001. ns: not significant.


Finally, we evaluated whether the immunity induced by V674pF1 was protective against a virulent F1-negative Y. pestis. To this aim, a CO92Δcaf1 Y. pestis was constructed. This mutant had an LD50 comparable to that of CO92 by the intranasal route (LD50 = 5.6×103 cfu as compared to 2.8×103 cfu for CO92). Mice vaccinated orally with 109 cfu of V674pF1 completely resisted a challenge infection (100% survival) by CO92Δcaf at both the 105 cfu infectious dose and the high 107 cfu dose (Fig. 6C).


Our initial study demonstrated that the naturally attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis strain IP32680 could serve as an oral vaccine against bubonic plague [17]. However, this strain had weaknesses that precluded its development for human use. Because its genome had not been analyzed, its naturally low virulence could have resulted from a point mutation, with the possibility that a reverse mutation could restore virulence. In addition, IP32680 inoculated orally conferred only a weak level of protection (30%) against the pneumonic form of plague [17], after two vaccine doses. The goals of the present work were therefore twofold: first, to obtain a strain whose attenuation was irreversible and well characterized, and second to provide high-level protection against pneumonic plague. The first objective was reached by using strain IP32953, whose genome has been sequenced [35], and to attenuate it by deleting three major virulence genes, thus preventing reversion to virulence.

The genetically attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis V674 strain provided 69% protection against pneumonic plague, and therefore was clearly more efficient than our previous IP32680 strain. However, it was still less efficient than attenuated Y. pestis strains used as plague vaccines in the past such as EV76 [36] or recently proposed engineered strains [37], [38]. Since the pioneer studies of Meyer, the F1 antigen composing the Y. pestis capsule is recognized as a major target of protective immunity due to its abundance and easy access at the bacteria surface [39]. F1 is absent from Y. pseudotuberculosis, and to enhance the efficiency of V674, the second step of our work was to introduce the caf operon coding for F1 into V674. With the presence of F1 at its surface, V674pF1 conferred full protection (100%) against pneumonic plague. Even against a very high intranasal challenge dose of CO92 (107 cfu, i.e. 3,300×LD50), V674pF1 had an excellent protective score (94%). V674pF1, after a single oral dose, thus reached a level of protection that had, to our knowledge, not been reported for other live vaccines, including attenuated Y. pestis strains [37], [40], [41] or recombinant vectors producing Y. pestis antigens such as Salmonella [11], [42] or viruses [12], [43].

The F1 capsule is not an essential virulence factor for Y. pestis in mammals (reviewed by [44]), as shown by the fact that F1-negative Y. pestis mutants are still mortal for mice, primates and humans ([45], [46], the present work) although it is required to achieve full pathogenicity in certain mouse strains [47]. Y. pestis virulence is recognized to be multifactorial, so that the transfer of a single gene in an avirulent Y. pseudotuberculosis was unlikely to increase its virulence. Indeed, high oral doses of V674pF1 induced no lethality, in agreement with similar observations in F1-producing Salmonella candidate vaccines [11].

The live attenuated vaccines have several advantages over subunit vaccines. Recently developed candidate vaccines against plague are composed of two antigens: the Y. pestis-specific capsular F1 antigen and the virulence plasmid-encoded V antigen (LcrV) common to the three pathogenic Yersinia species. Molecular and live vaccines based on F1 and V provide protection to mice against pneumonic plague [12], [13], [14], [16], however they confer only variable levels of protection to non-human primates [48]. Such molecular vaccines using Alum as adjuvant mainly induce antibody production against the F1 antigen [49], allowing virulent Y. pestis variants lacking the F1 antigen to escape from the protective immunity of anti-F1 antibodies [46]. In contrast, live vaccines are strong inducers not only of humoral immunity but also of cell-mediated immunity [48], an important component of protection against pneumonic plague [50]. We observed that splenocytes from mice orally vaccinated with both V674pF1 and V674 strongly produced IFNγ upon restimulation in vitro with Y. pseudotuberculosis antigens, indicating the development of a Y. pseudotuberculosis–specific cellular immunity. IFNγ typically characterizes the type 1 response critical for optimal vaccine-induced protection against Y. pestis infection. Indeed, it was previously shown that injection of IFNγ and TNFα protects mice against Y. pestis infection [51] and that neutralization of these cytokines abrogates vaccine-induced protection against pneumonic plague [52]. IFNγ activates phagocytes and help them destroy internalized bacteria. Therefore the potent IFNγ production by splenocytes from vaccinated mice observed in the present work may have such a role. The recruitment of Yersinia-specific cells producing IL-17 (Th17) was also observed. There is growing evidence that the development of Th17 cells is critical to vaccine-induced protection against mucosal infections by pathogenic bacteria, parasites, viruses and fungi [31], [53]. Indeed, IL-17 is a powerful inducer of PMN recruitment and release of antimicrobial peptides, and contributes to immunity induced against pneumonic plague by an attenuated Y. pestis candidate vaccine [34]. Because such effector Th17 cells can collaborate with Th1 lymphocytes [53], the induction of both subsets by V674pF1 may be a key of the high protection observed against Y. pestis in the lungs.

It is most notable that vaccination using the live attenuated V674pF1 Y. pseudotuberculosis strain provided full protection against pneumonic plague caused by a virulent Y. pestis strains lacking the F1 antigen, whereas the live attenuated Y. pestis KIM D27 (Δpgm), used as vaccine in other studies, failed to protect [46], [49]. This inability of a live Y. pestis to protect was interpreted as resulting from a focalization of the immune response against the abundant F1 covering the bacteria, to the detriment of other antigens [49]. On the contrary, we show here that V674pF1 was able to trigger immunity simultaneously against F1 and the large array of target antigens common to Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis, as demonstrated by the comparable IgG titers against these antigens observed after vaccination with vaccine strains producing F1 or not. Moreover, the cellular response against Yersinia antigens was not only comparable after vaccination with V674 or V674pF1, but was also much stronger than that induced by the F1 antigen. This absence of focalization of the immune response on F1 thereby greatly enhances the likelihood of protection against a wide spectrum of Y. pestis variants. The contrast with studies using KIM D27 as vaccine [46], [49] cannot be ascribed to a difference in the amount of F1 capsule because V674pF1 produces as much F1 as Y. pestis. It could rather result from yet unidentified differences of immunogenicity between the two Yersinia species, or on the different routes of vaccination (intramuscular versus oral). In this regard, the F1 capsule also did not alter the capacity of the Y. pseudotuberculosis strain to settle in the intestinal tract. This was however not surprising because Y. pestis is virulent by the oral route, as shown by human plague cases after eating meat from an infected animal [54]. That V674pF1 was efficient through the oral route was an additional advantage because oral vaccination is both convenient, well accepted by persons, and avoids the risk of contamination through used syringes during mass vaccination.

In previous studies of mouse vaccination with F1-V subunit vaccines, repeated injections were required to obtain full protection [14], [16]. In contrast, full protection against pneumonic plague was obtained in the present work after vaccination with a single oral dose of V674pF1. The capacity of live vaccines to stimulate immunity for an extended period of time was the likely key to this efficiency. V674pF1 given by the oral route persisted for weeks in the gut, allowing a prolonged antigen presentation to the immune system.

F1 production significantly improved the performance of V674pF1 compared to V674, consistent with the development of F1-targeted effector mechanisms efficient in the lungs. The production of high amounts of IgG and IgA indicated that the humoral immune response was triggered at both systemic and mucosal levels. Antibodies contribute to defense against pneumonic plague, as shown by previous studies in which non-immune or immunodeficient mice were protected by instillation of anti-F1 antibodies in the airways [55], [56], [57]. Seric IgG have an easy access to the highly vascularized lung tissues and those induced by V674pF1 may have played such a role. Because immunization started at a mucosal surface, IgA could also have been actors of V674pF1-induced lung immunity [58]. No IgA could however be detected in bronchoalveolar lavages, showing that IgA were not necessary to protection.

In summary, this study demonstrated that a high level protection against pneumonic plague can be obtained by a single oral vaccination with the live attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis V674pF1 producing the Y. pestis F1 capsule. Because the strain has been irreversibly attenuated by deletion of essential virulence factors, it colonizes the intestinal tract without causing lesions and stimulates both humoral and cell-mediated anti-plague immunity. Easy to administrate orally and costless to produce, this candidate vaccine is therefore well adapted to mass vaccination in endemic tropical regions, offering promising perspectives to control pneumonic plague mortality and transmission.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Mice do not lose weight after oral inoculation of attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis strains. The weight of mice vaccinated orally at day 0 with strains V674 (A), or V674pF1 (B) at the indicated dose, or unvaccinated littermates (naive) was measured at regular intervals. Shown are means ± s.e.m. of 16 mice per group. No difference between groups at any given time was statistically significant.



Table S1.

Primers used in this study.



Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AD EC CED. Performed the experiments: AD ACM PA TB MH CED. Analyzed the data: AD ACM MH CED. Wrote the paper: EC CED.


  1. 1. WHO (2009) Human plague: review of regional morbidity and mortality, 2004–2009. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 85: 40–45.
  2. 2. Arbaji A, Kharabsheh S, Al-Azab S, Al-Kayed M, Amr ZS, et al. (2005) A 12-case outbreak of pharyngeal plague following the consumption of camel meat, in north-eastern Jordan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 99: 789–793.
  3. 3. Bertherat E, Bekhoucha S, Chougrani S, Razik F, Duchemin JB, et al. (2007) Plague reappearance in Algeria after 50 years, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 1459–1462.
  4. 4. McClean KL (1995) An outbreak of plague in northwestern province, Zambia. Clin Infect Dis 21: 650–652.
  5. 5. Ratsitorahina M, Chanteau S, Rahalison L, Ratsifasoamanana L, Boisier P (2000) Epidemiological and diagnostic aspects of the outbreak of pneumonic plague in Madagascar. Lancet 355: 111–113.
  6. 6. Bertherat E, Lamine KM, Formenty P, Thuier P, Mondonge V, et al. (2005) Major pulmonary plague outbreak in a mining camp in the Democratic Republic of Congo: brutal awakening of an old scourge. Med Trop (Mars) 65: 511–514.
  7. 7. Galimand M, Guiyoule A, Gerbaud G, Rasoamanana B, Chanteau S, et al. (1997) Multidrug resistance in Yersinia pestis mediated by a transferable plasmid. N Engl J Med 337: 677–680.
  8. 8. Welch TJ, Fricke WF, McDermott PF, White DG, Rosso ML, et al. (2007) Multiple antimicrobial resistance in plague: an emerging public health risk. PLoS One 2: e309.
  9. 9. Inglesby TV, Dennis DT, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, et al. (2000) Plague as a biological weapon - Medical and public health management. J Am Med Assoc 283: 2281–2290.
  10. 10. Meyer KF, Hightower JA, McCrumb FR (1974) Plague immunization. VI. Vaccination with the fraction I antigen of Yersinia pestis. J Infect Dis 129: S41–45.
  11. 11. Oyston PCF, Williamson ED, Leary SEC, Eley SM, Griffin KF, et al. (1995) Immunization with live recombinant Salmonella typhimurium aroA producing F1 antigen protects against plague. Infect Immun 63: 563–568.
  12. 12. Chiuchiolo MJ, Boyer JL, Krause A, Senina S, Hackett NR, et al. (2006) Protective immunity against respiratory tract challenge with Yersinia pestis in mice immunized with an adenovirus-based vaccine vector expressing V antigen. J Infect Dis 194: 1249–1257.
  13. 13. Osorio JE, Powell TD, Frank RS, Moss K, Haanes EJ, et al. (2003) Recombinant raccoon pox vaccine protects mice against lethal plague. Vaccine 21: 1232–1238.
  14. 14. Heath DG, Anderson GW, Mauro JM, Welkos SL, Andrews GP, et al. (1998) Protection Against Experimental Bubonic and Pneumonic Plague By a Recombinant Capsular F1-V Antigen Fusion Protein Vaccine. Vaccine 16: 1131–1137.
  15. 15. Une T, Brubaker RR (1984) Roles of V antigen in promoting virulence and immunity in Yersiniae. J Immunol 133: 2226–2230.
  16. 16. Williamson ED, Eley SM, Griffin KF, Green M, Russell P, et al. (1995) A new improved sub-unit vaccine for plague: The basis of protection. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 12: 223–230.
  17. 17. Blisnick T, Ave P, Huerre M, Carniel E, Demeure CE (2008) Oral vaccination against bubonic plague using a live avirulent Yersinia pseudotuberculosis strain. Infect Immun 76: 3808–3816.
  18. 18. Achtman M, Zurth K, Morelli C, Torrea G, Guiyoule A, et al. (1999) Yersinia pestis, the cause of plague, is a recently emerged clone of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 14043–14048.
  19. 19. Zhou DS, Han YP, Dai EH, Song YJ, Pei DC, et al. (2004) Defining the genome content of live plague vaccines by use of whole-genome DNA microarray. Vaccine 22: 3367–3374.
  20. 20. Chain PS, Carniel E, Larimer FW, Lamerdin J, Stoutland PO, et al. (2004) Insights into the evolution of Yersinia pestis through whole-genome comparison with Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 13826–13831.
  21. 21. Derbise A, Lesic B, Dacheux D, Ghigo JM, Carniel E (2003) A rapid and simple method for inactivating chromosomal genes in Yersinia. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 38: 113–116.
  22. 22. Lane MC, Alteri CJ, Smith SN, Mobley HL (2007) Expression of flagella is coincident with uropathogenic Escherichia coli ascension to the upper urinary tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 16669–16674.
  23. 23. Galen JE, Nair J, Wang JY, Wasserman SS, Tanner MK, et al. (1999) Optimization of plasmid maintenance in the attenuated live vector vaccine strain Salmonella typhi CVD 908-htrA. Infect Immun 67: 6424–6433.
  24. 24. Burrows TW, Bacon GA (1953) The basis of virulence in Pasteurella pestis: an antigen determining virulence. Brit J Exp Pathol 37: 481–493.
  25. 25. Chanteau S, Rahalison L, Ralafiarisoa L, Foulon J, Ratsitorahina M, et al. (2003) Development and testing of a rapid diagnostic test for bubonic and pneumonic plague. Lancet 361: 211–216.
  26. 26. Reed I, Muench H (1938) A simple method for estimating fifty percent end points. Am J Hyg 27: 493–497.
  27. 27. Mishell B, Shiigi S (1980) Selected Methods in Cellular Immunology. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co. pp. 23–24.
  28. 28. Carniel E (1999) The Yersinia high-pathogenicity island. Int Microbiol 2: 161–167.
  29. 29. Lindler LE, Klempner MS, Straley SC (1990) Yersinia pestis pH-6 Antigen - Genetic, Biochemical, and Virulence Characterization of a Protein Involved in the Pathogenesis of Bubonic Plague. Infect Immun 58: 2569–2577.
  30. 30. Holmstrom A, Rosqvist R, Wolfwatz H, Forsberg A (1995) Virulence plasmid-encoded YopK is essential for Yersinia pseudotuberculosis to cause systemic infection in mice. Infect Immun 63: 2269–2276.
  31. 31. Khader SA, Gaffen SL, Kolls JK (2009) Th17 cells at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity against infectious diseases at the mucosa. Mucosal Immunol 2: 403–411.
  32. 32. Priebe GP, Walsh RL, Cederroth TA, Kamei A, Coutinho-Sledge YS, et al. (2008) IL-17 is a critical component of vaccine-induced protection against lung infection by lipopolysaccharide-heterologous strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Immunol 181: 4965–4975.
  33. 33. Ye P, Garvey PB, Zhang P, Nelson S, Bagby G, et al. (2001) Interleukin-17 and lung host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 25: 335–340.
  34. 34. Lin JS, Kummer LW, Szaba FM, Smiley ST (2011) IL-17 contributes to cell-mediated defense against pulmonary Yersinia pestis infection. J Immunol 186: 1675–1684.
  35. 35. Chain P, Regala W, Marieiro L, Souza B, Elliott J, et al. (2002) Whole genome sequencing of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis: Examining pathogen evolution among the recently emerged Yersinia. Abstracts of the General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 102:
  36. 36. Girard G (1963) L'immunité dans l'infection pesteuse. Acquisitions apportées par 30 années de travaux sur la souche de “Pasteurella pestis EV”. Biol Méd 52: 631–731.
  37. 37. Montminy SW, Khan N, McGrath S, Walkowicz MJ, Sharp F, et al. (2006) Virulence factors of Yersinia pestis are overcome by a strong lipopolysaccharide response. Nat Immunol 7: 1066–1073.
  38. 38. Zauberman A, Tidhar A, Levy Y, Bar-Haim E, Halperin G, et al. (2009) Yersinia pestis endowed with increased cytotoxicity is avirulent in a bubonic plague model and induces rapid protection against pneumonic plague. PLoS One 4: e5938.
  39. 39. Baker EE, Sommer H, Foster LE, Meyer E, Meyer KF (1952) Studies on immunization against plague. I. The isolation and characterization of the soluble antigen of Pasteurella pestis. J Immunol 68: 131–145.
  40. 40. Bubeck SS, Dube PH (2007) Yersinia pestis CO92 delta yopH is a potent live, attenuated plague vaccine. Clin Vaccine Immunol 14: 1235–1238.
  41. 41. Flashner Y, Mamroud E, Tidhar A, Ber R, Aftalion M, et al. (2004) Generation of Yersinia pestis attenuated strains by signature-tagged mutagenesis in search of novel vaccine candidates. Infect Immun 72: 908–915.
  42. 42. Yang XH, Hinnebusch BJ, Trunkle T, Bosio CM, Suo ZY, et al. (2007) Oral vaccination with Salmonella simultaneously expressing Yersinia pestis F1 and V antigens protects against bubonic and pneumonic plague. J Immunol 178: 1059–1067.
  43. 43. Chattopadhyay A, Park S, Delmas G, Suresh R, Senina S, et al. (2008) Single-dose, virus-vectored vaccine protection against Yersinia pestis challenge: CD4+ cells are required at the time of challenge for optimal protection. Vaccine 26: 6329–6337.
  44. 44. McIntyre S, Knight SD, J. FL (2004) Structure, assembly and applications of the polymeric F1 antigen of Yersinia pestis. In: Carniel E, Hinnebusch BJ, editors. Yersinia, molecular and Cellular Biology. Wymondham: Horizon Press. pp. 363–407.
  45. 45. Knight SD (2007) Structure and assembly of Yersinia pestis F1 antigen. Genus Yersinia: from Genomics to Function 603: 74–87.
  46. 46. Cornelius CA, Quenee LE, Elli D, Ciletti NA, Schneewind O (2009) Yersinia pestis IS1541 transposition provides for escape from plague immunity. Infect Immun 77: 1807–1816.
  47. 47. Weening EH, Cathelyn JS, Kaufman G, Lawrenz MB, Price P, et al. (2011) The dependence of the Yersinia pestis capsule on pathogenesis is influenced by the mouse background. Infect Immun 79: 644–652.
  48. 48. Smiley ST (2008) Current challenges in the development of vaccines for pneumonic plague. Expert Rev Vaccines 7: 209–221.
  49. 49. Quenee LE, Cornelius CA, Ciletti NA, Elli D, Schneewind O (2008) Yersinia pestis caf1 variants and the limits of plague vaccine protection. Infect Immun 76: 2025–2036.
  50. 50. Smiley ST (2008) Immune defense against pneumonic plague. Immunol Rev 225: 256–271.
  51. 51. Nakajima R, Brubaker RR (1993) Association between virulence of Yersinia pestis and suppression of gamma interferon and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Infect Immun 61: 23–31.
  52. 52. Parent MA, Wilhelm LB, Kummer LW, Szaba FM, Mullarky IK, et al. (2006) Gamma interferon, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and nitric oxide synthase 2, key elements of cellular immunity, perform critical protective functions during humoral defense against lethal pulmonary Yersinia pestis infection. Infect Immun 74: 3381–3386.
  53. 53. Lin Y, Slight SR, Khader SA (2010) Th17 cytokines and vaccine-induced immunity. Semin Immunopathol 32: 79–90.
  54. 54. Christie AB, Chen TH, Elberg SS (1980) Plague in camels and goats: their role in human epidemics. J Infect Dis 141: 724–726.
  55. 55. Anderson GW, Worsham PL, Bolt CR, Andrews GP, Welkos SL, et al. (1997) Protection of mice from fatal bubonic and pneumonic plague by passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies against the F1 protein of Yersinia pestis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 56: 471–473.
  56. 56. Green M, Rogers D, Russell P, Stagg AJ, Bell DL, et al. (1999) The SCID/Beige mouse as a model to investigate protection against Yersinia pestis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 23: 107–113.
  57. 57. Hill J, Copse C, Leary S, Stagg AJ, Williamson ED, et al. (2003) Synergistic protection of mice against plague with monoclonal antibodies specific for the F1 and V antigens of Yersinia pestis. Infect Immun 71: 2234–2238.
  58. 58. Cerutti A, Chen K, Chorny A (2010) Immunoglobulin Responses at the Mucosal Interfaces. Annu Rev Immunol 29: 273–293.
  59. 59. Parkhill J, Wren BW, Thomson NR, Titball RW, Holden MTG, et al. (2001) Genome sequence of Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague. Nature 413: 523–527.
  60. 60. Pouillot F, Derbise A, Kukkonen M, Foulon J, Korhonen TK, et al. (2005) Evaluation of O-antigen inactivation on Pla activity and virulence of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis harbouring the pPla plasmid. Microbiology 151: 3759–3768.
  61. 61. Derbise A, Chenal-Francisque V, Pouillot F, Fayolle C, Prevost MC, et al. (2007) A horizontally acquired filamentous phage contributes to the pathogenicity of the plague bacillus. Mol Microbiol 63: 1145–1157.
  62. 62. Lesic B, Carniel E (2005) Horizontal transfer of the high-pathogenicity island of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. J Bacteriol 187: 3352–3358.
  63. 63. Demarre G, Guerout AM, Matsumoto-Mashimo C, Rowe-Magnus DA, Marliere P, et al. (2005) A new family of mobilizable suicide plasmids based on broad host range R388 plasmid (IncW) and RP4 plasmid (IncPalpha) conjugative machineries and their cognate Escherichia coli host strains. Res Microbiol 156: 245–255.